MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

69 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20012025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
69 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 2

Labels cover 0 of 69 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 69 of 69 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Molecular pathways triggering glioma cell invasion
Bodour Salhia, Nhan L. Tran, Marc Symons, Jeffrey A. Winkles, James T. Rutka, Michael E. Berens
2006· review· en· Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
66
citations
affunlabeled
Choroideremia gene testing
Ian M. MacDonald, Christina Sereda, Kerry E. McTaggart, Dean Mah
2004· review· en· Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
59
citations
afffundunlabeled
HIV self-testing strategy: the middle road
Nitika Pant Pai, Keertan Dheda
2013· editorial· en· Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
12
citations
affunlabeled
Biomarker imprecision in precision medicine
Kenneth P. H. Pritzker
2018· editorial· en· Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
12
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Theranostics: rethinking postgenomic diagnostics
Vural Özdemir, William C. Cho
2012· article· en· Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About