MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Fundamenta Mathematicae
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

32 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
32 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 1

Labels cover 0 of 32 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 32 of 32 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Chain conditions in maximal models
Paul Larson, Stevo Todorčević
2001· article· en· Fundamenta Mathematicae· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
afffundunlabeled
On dimensionally restricted maps
H. Murat Tuncali, Vesko Valov
2002· article· en· Fundamenta Mathematicae· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
26
citations
affunlabeled
Another ♦-like principle
Michael Hrušák
2001· article· en· Fundamenta Mathematicae· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
affunlabeled
Existentially closed ${\rm II}_1$ factors
Ilijas Farah, Isaac Goldbring, Bradd Hart, David K. Sherman
2015· article· en· Fundamenta Mathematicae· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affunlabeled
Powers of countable Fréchet spaces
Yinhe Peng, Stevo Todorčević
2019· article· en· Fundamenta Mathematicae· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Countable Toronto spaces
Gary Gruenhage, J. Tach Moore
2000· article· en· Fundamenta Mathematicae· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Free spaces
Jianwei Song, E. D. Tymchatyn
2000· article· ceb· Fundamenta Mathematicae· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
afffundunlabeled
High-dimensional sequential compactness
César Corral, Osvaldo Guzmán, Carlos López-Callejas
2023· article· en· Fundamenta Mathematicae· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
Loeb extension and Loeb equivalence II
Haosui Duanmu, David Schrittesser, William Weiss
2023· article· en· Fundamenta Mathematicae· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About