MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
International Journal of e-Collaboration
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

15 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20052018
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
15 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 1

Labels cover 0 of 15 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 15 of 15 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Virtual Team Leadership
Laura Hambley, Tom O’Neill, Theresa J. B. Kline
2007· article· en· International Journal of e-Collaboration· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
104
citations
affunlabeled
Virtual Teams
Alain Pinsonneault, Olivier Caya
2005· article· en· International Journal of e-Collaboration· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
96
citations
affunlabeled
Virtual Teams Demystified
Olivier Caya, Mark Mortensen, Alain Pinsonneault
2013· article· en· International Journal of e-Collaboration· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
30
citations
affunlabeled
Patterns in Electronic Brainstorming
Alan R. Dennis, Alain Pinsonneault, Kelly McNamara Hilmer, Henri Barki, Brent Galupe, M. E. Huber +1 more
2005· article· en· International Journal of e-Collaboration· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
26
citations
affunlabeled
Self-Regulation in Instant Messaging (IM)
Anabel Quan‐Haase
2010· article· en· International Journal of e-Collaboration· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
affunlabeled
The Level Paradox of E-Collaboration
Ana Ortíz de Guinea
2011· article· en· International Journal of e-Collaboration· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
Using IOS in a Collaborative Way
Hamid Nach, Marie‐Claude Boudreau
2018· article· en· International Journal of e-Collaboration· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About