MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

42 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002024
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
42 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 1

Labels cover 0 of 42 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 42 of 42 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
The software model checker Blast
Dirk Beyer, Thomas A. Henzinger, Ranjit Jhala, Rupak Majumdar
2007· article· en· International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
594
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
MDA-based Automatic OWL Ontology Development
Dragan Gašević, Dragan Djurić, Vladan Devedžić
2006· article· en· International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
48
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Framework testing of web applications using TTCN-3
Bernard Stépien, Liam Peyton, Pulei Xiong
2008· article· en· International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
26
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The Clara framework for hybrid typestate analysis
Eric Bodden, Laurie Hendren
2010· article· en· International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
26
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Software engineering practices and Simulink: bridging the gap
Vera Pantelic, Steven Postma, Mark Lawford, Monika Jaskolka, Bennett Mackenzie, Alexandre Korobkine +4 more
2017· article· en· International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Encoding a process algebra using the Event B method
Yamine Aït-Ameur, Mickaël Baron, Nadjet Kamel, Jean‐Marc Mota
2009· article· en· International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
21
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Exploiting resolution proofs to speed up LTL vacuity detection for BMC
Jocelyn Simmonds, Jessica Davies, Arie Gurfinkel, Marsha Chećhik
2010· article· en· International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Hierarchical formal verification using a hybrid tool
Skander Kort, Sofi�ne Tahar, Paul Curzon
2003· article· en· International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
12
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Comparison of SPIN and VIS for protocol verification
Hong Peng, Sofi�ne Tahar, Ferhat Khendek
2003· article· en· International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
12
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
What can we monitor over unreliable channels?
Sean Kauffman, Klaus Havelund, Sebastian Fischmeister
2021· article· en· International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Algorithm selection for SMT
Joseph Scott, Aina Niemetz, Mathias Preiner, Saeed Nejati, Vijay Ganesh
2023· article· en· International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Security by typing
Mourad Debbabi, Nancy Durgin, Mohamed Mejri, John C. Mitchell
2003· article· en· International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Approximating the safely reusable set of learned facts
Domagoj Babić, Alan J. Hu
2009· article· en· International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Publisher Correction: Algorithm selection for SMT
Joseph Scott, Aina Niemetz, Mathias Preiner, Saeed Nejati, Vijay Ganesh
2023· article· en· International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
On piggyback runtime monitoring of object-oriented programs
Sylvain Hallé, Jason Vallet, Raphaël Tremblay-Lessard
2014· article· en· International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Preface
Hana Chockler, Alan J. Hu
2011· article· en· International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
A light-weight framework for hardware verification
Christoph Kern, Tarik Ono-Tesfaye, Mark R. Greenstreet
2001· article· en· International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Modeling of a speed control system using Event-B
Amel Mammar, Marc Frappier
2024· article· en· International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
A framework for distributing object-oriented designs
Karim El Guemhioui
2003· article· en· International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About