MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Metascience
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

58 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
58 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 2

Labels cover 0 of 58 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 58 of 58 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
What-if history of science
Alan C. Love, Robert J. Richards, Peter J. Bowler
2014· article· en· Metascience· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
9
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Objectivity in historical perspective
Peter Dear, Ian Hacking, Matthew L. Jones, Lorraine Daston, Peter Galison
2012· article· en· Metascience· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
8
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
On Newton’s method
Nick Huggett, George Smith, David Marshall Miller, William Harper
2013· article· en· Metascience· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The burdens of proof
Glen Van Brummelen
2016· article· en· Metascience· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Regress and rhetoric at the Tuscan court
Marco Beretta, Mordechai Feingold, Paula Findlen, Luciano Boschiero
2010· article· en· Metascience· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Less is more, more or less
Michel‐Antoine Xhignesse
2024· article· en· Metascience· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The Life and Death of Hypatia
J. L. Berggren
2009· article· en· Metascience· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Reviews
Ivan Crozier, Susan Hardy, D.B. Rutledge, Niall Shanks, Ian J. Slater, Daryn Lehoux +17 more
2001· article· en· Metascience
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The Complexity of Poincaré
Richard Feist
2015· article· en· Metascience· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Rorty, Brandom, and women
Susan Dieleman
2023· article· en· Metascience· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Making a Metaphysics for Nature
Anjan Chakravartty
2009· article· en· Metascience· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Defining Mental Disorder
Jonathan Y. Tsou
2009· article· en· Metascience· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
A physicist’s history of relativity
Yves Gingras
2025· article· en· Metascience· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Sexual selection re-examined
Sara Weaver
2016· article· en· Metascience· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
More worry and less love?
Alan C. Love, Ingo Brigandt, Karola Stotz, Daniel Schweitzer, Alexander Rosenber
2008· article· en· Metascience· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Early German Darwinism reconsidered
Georgy S. Levit, Uwe Hoßfeld
2010· article· en· Metascience· Immunology and Microbiology
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Physics and the manifest image of time
M. Joshua Mozersky
2018· article· en· Metascience· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Reviews
Phil Dowe, William Demopoulos, Nessy Allen, Martin J. S. Rudwick, F. John Clendinnen, Rachel A. Ankeny +9 more
2000· article· en· Metascience
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Seeing is Reasoning
Kathryn Mann, James Robert Brown
2007· article· en· Metascience· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
A burning question
Cordy Tymstra
2023· article· en· Metascience· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Gravitation and spontaneous collapse
M. Joshua Mozersky
2025· article· en· Metascience· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Thinking through illustration
Michel‐Antoine Xhignesse
2023· article· en· Metascience· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Pillow talk
Christabelle Sethna
2010· article· en· Metascience
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Implementing the Canberra Plan
E. Díaz‐León
2011· article· en· Metascience· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Does mathematics have a life of its own?
James Robert Brown
2011· article· en· Metascience· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Providence and necessity
Amitavo Islam
2010· article· en· Metascience· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The assessment of standards
Robert Brain
2022· article· en· Metascience· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
On chance
Joshua Luczak
2012· article· en· Metascience· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Watt as an ‘improver’ and chemist
Leslie Tomory
2020· article· en· Metascience· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
‘Inventing’ the telescope
Luciano Boschiero
2013· article· en· Metascience· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
A syllabus of (some of) Gingras’ errors
Yiftach Fehige, Adam Richter
2019· article· en· Metascience· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The logic and politics of cosmology
Robert Hudson
2020· article· en· Metascience· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Understanding why we are confused
Ingo Brigandt
2023· article· en· Metascience· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
0
citations
next →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About