MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Nineteenth Century Contexts
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

21 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20032024
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
21 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 1

Labels cover 0 of 21 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 21 of 21 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Reviews
Lauren Fitzgerald, Phillip H. Round, Bryan Waterman, Eleanor Courtemanche, Kit Belgum, Laura L. Mielke +2 more
2009· article· en· Nineteenth Century Contexts· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Reviews
Ashton Nichols, Laura Dassow Walls, Elaine Ostry, Mary Chapman, Máire ní Fhlathúin, Judith Johnston +2 more
2006· article· en· Nineteenth Century Contexts· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
REVIEWS
Richard Nemesvari, Beth S. Wright, Gowan Dawson, Molly Youngkin, K Johnson, Cian Duffy +2 more
2008· article· en· Nineteenth Century Contexts· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Reviews
Michael John DiSanto, Jan Pilditch, Christine L. Krueger, Mary Elizabeth Leighton, Elsie B. Michie, Martin Willis +2 more
2010· article· en· Nineteenth Century Contexts· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Reviews
David Lloyd, Christopher Kent, Mark Rose, Elizabeth Fay, Laura Berry, Anya Taylor +2 more
2006· article· en· Nineteenth Century Contexts
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Reviews
Kate Costello‐Sullivan, Rosemarie K. Bank, Ellen Weinauer, Matthew Rowlinson, Diana Maltz, Jeannette Marie Mageo +2 more
2008· article· en· Nineteenth Century Contexts
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Preface: Romanticism and Sexual Vice
Daniel O’Quinn
2005· article· en· Nineteenth Century Contexts· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About