MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

36 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20152024
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
36 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 1

Labels cover 0 of 36 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 36 of 36 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affaboutunlabeled
DEAP-3600 Dark Matter Search
2016· article· en· Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
affunlabeled
Diamond Particle Detectors for High Energy Physics
W. Trischuk, M. Artuso, F. Bachmair, L. Bäni, M. Bartosik, Vincenzo Bellini +119 more
2016· article· en· Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
The Bridge Between Chiral Lagrangians and QCD Sum-Rules
Amir H. Fariborz, J. Ho, Andrzej Pokraka, T. G. Steele
2020· article· en· Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Dilepton radiation and bulk viscosity in heavy-ion collisions
G. Vujanovic, Jean-François Paquet, Chun Shen, Gabriel S. Denicol, Sangyong Jeon, Charles Gale +1 more
2017· article· en· Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" altimg="si1.gif" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>s</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> from the (revised) ALEPH data for τ decay
Diogo Boito, Maarten Golterman, Kim Maltman, James Osborne, Santiago Peris
2015· article· lv· Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
B→ρ,K⁎ transition form factors in AdS/QCD model
Mohammad Ahmady, Robyn Campbell, Sébastien Lord, Ruben Sandapen
2016· article· en· Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
afffundunlabeled
Holographic Photon Production and Anisotropic Flow
Ioannis Iatrakis, Elias Kiritsis, Chun Shen, Di-Lun Yang
2017· article· en· Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
HFAG τ lepton averages and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" altimg="si1.gif" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>V</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="italic">us</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo> </mml:math> determination with τ decays
A. Lusiani, M. Chrząszcz, K. Hayasaka, H. Hayashii, J. M. Roney, B. Shwartz +1 more
2015· article· lv· Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
α from the updated ALEPH data for hadronic τ decays
Diogo Boito, Maarten Golterman, Kim Maltman, James Osborne, Santiago Peris
2016· article· en· Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Electroweak radiative corrections at high energies
J.H. Kühn, Alexander A. Penin
2015· article· en· Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The status of the strong coupling from tau decays in 2016
Diogo Boito, Maarten Golterman, Kim Maltman, Santiago Peris
2017· article· en· Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Electromagnetic Polarizabilities of Mesons
A. Aleksejevs, S. Barkanova
2016· article· en· Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The pion in holographic light-front QCD
Mohammad Ahmady, Farrukh Chishtie, Ruben Sandapen
2018· article· en· Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About