MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Religion
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

47 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
47 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 1

Labels cover 0 of 47 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 47 of 47 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affaboutunlabeled
The Invention of Sacred Tradition
Steven Engler
2009· article· en· Religion· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
18
citations
affunlabeled
<i>Religion:</i> reviewers 2017–2018
Michael Stausberg, Steven Engler
2020· article· en· Religion· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Eric J. Sharpe (1933–2000)
Arvind Sharma
2001· article· en· Religion· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Book reviews
Michael Stausberg, Jenna Gray-Hildenbrand, Loriliai Biernacki, Benjamin Sax, Julius Lipner, D. Paul Sullins +29 more
2010· article· en· Religion· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Ninian Smart: A Tribute
Donald Wiebe
2001· article· en· Religion· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Book review
Bryan Rennie
2002· article· en· Religion· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Encountering Ninian Smart
Arvind Sharma
2001· article· en· Religion· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Book reviews
Scott Davis, Eileen Barker, Laurence Coupe, Dan Merkur, Knut A. Jacobsen, W.S.F. Pickering +10 more
2000· article· en· Religion· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Book reviews
John Coker, Bradley L. Herling, Rosane Rocher, Robert W. Ackerman, Anne E. Monius, Charles Keyes +5 more
2005· article· en· Religion· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About