Townscape character changes and visual analysis as determinants for shaping the spatial structure of the city - Kielce case study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The article presents the results of the analysis carried out under the Environmental Study for Local Development Policy of Kielce. The main goal of the analysis was to identify the primary conditions which should be taken into consideration when preserving the visual values in urban planning. The analysis was focused on identification and description of the existing features within landscape (including their transformation) and on its ability to accommodate changes. The first step of the survey was focused on identification of changes in the townscape character, taking into account: extent of the urban fabric, character of the built-up areas and their origin. The analysis of changes in the townscape was based on archival cartographic materials. To determine the cultural stratigraphy of the town a three-time scale was used: areas formed before the middle of the twentieth century, areas created in the 3rd quarter of the twentieth century and areas created in the 4th quarter of the twentieth century and at the beginning of the twenty-first century. Analysis of changes in the landscape consisted mainly of changes in the land use structure, as well as the analysis of layout of individual elements forming the urban landscape (e.g. landmarks). The second part of the study was related to examining the visual exposure of identified townscape character areas. The exposure analysis was based on views from the scenic viewpoints as well as a sequence of points located along major transit roads and hiking trails. Totally more than 100 viewpoints were analyzed. This analysis aimed at presenting areas particularly exposed in the townscape. On the basis of townscape changes and visual exposure the authors of the study assessed the state of landscape values preservation and the visual absorption capacity. This assessment was a starting point to work out guidelines for future development. Special attention was paid to areas important for preservation of landscape exposition of objects of special cultural values (1) and areas dedicated to urban development with low visual absorption capacity (2). Recommendations for spatial development comprise: restrictions on location of high construction works as well as woodlands and other high vegetation (1), the need for adapting new buildings to the surrounding landscape and to the form and dimensions of existing objects (2). Identifications and assessment of the visual aspects as well as changes in the landscape became, together with the conditions resulting from the state and functioning of the environment, one of the major determinants for shaping the spatial structure of the city.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».