MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W101204581

Cooperative Religion in Quebec

2004· article· en· W101204581 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of ecumenical studies · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésProtestantismFaithThronePoliticsReligious studiesHistoryFrenchHenry IV, Holy Roman EmperorLawTheologySociologyPolitical sciencePhilosophyArchaeology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction Analysts have contrasted Protestant New England and Roman Catholic Quebec for several centuries. (1) How did two different versions of the Christian faith affect, among other aspects, language, education, politics, liberty, economic development, spirituality, and greed? Such value judgments related to religion have become unfashionable since Vatican II, 1962-65. Yet, there is no doubt that faith has made a fundamental difference in Quebec. This essay will examine the interactions and efforts toward cooperation among different Christian faith traditions resident in the Quebec area. The lesser-known group of French Protestants at the intersection between the two solitudes of English Protestants and French Catholics will be highlighted first. This is followed by a study of one crucial episode in the breakthrough of Catholic-Protestant cooperation in the 1958-67 period, based on many documents and interviews inaccessible to English readers. I. New France French Protestants (Huguenots) and Roman Catholics worked together virtually from the start of white exploration of North America. The sacred union of the French state with the Catholic Church never changed, yet Huguenots were surprisingly dominant in the earliest explorations. Economic advantages in being permitted to lend money, (2) combined with a maritime location for many Protestants, favored them as merchants. When Henry IV, a former Protestant, took the French throne shortly before 1600, his associates (mostly Protestant) prospered. Most of the early lieutenant governors of New France or Acadia (the Maritimes) and most of their sailors were French Protestants, (3) but usually they had Catholic crew as well. After the assassination of Henry IV, religious tolerance rapidly diminished, and the universal norm of one nation-one church returned. In New France, the colony required unity and resident colonists. There had never been cooperation between Catholic clergy and Protestants. With the arrival of counter-Reformation Jesuits in Quebec, the fate of the Huguenots was sealed; the Protestant lieutenant governors had failed to settle colonists, while Protestants in La Rochelle were resisting the new French king's order to lay down their arms. Therefore, from 1627, French Protestants were banned from settling in New France, and religious uniformity was strictly imposed. (4) Huguenot merchants were still needed for trade and so received an exemption for summer visits. In the new setting, colonists were limited to the spiritual guidance of Jesuit clergy. (5) II. French Protestants Return The British who invaded New France in 1759-60 were led by a Huguenot commander, Jean-Louis Ligonier, (6) with many French-speaking Protestant soldiers, including most of the Royal Americans Regiment under the charge of the Swiss officer Frederick Haldimand. The original British intention of imposing English and Anglicanism on French Catholic colonists was never seriously pursued, as the various governors appointed by the British realized that this would be impossible. Quebecers might join the American unrest leading up to the American Revolution of 1776 and again in the War of 1812. Concessions had to be granted to the Catholic Church and to the use of the French language. In the long run, the Roman Catholic Church received more power than it had exercised under France, (7) including control of education, health, and rural municipalities. In addition, it avoided the effects of the French Revolution. At the most critical points, two Huguenot soldiers, Haldimand (during the American Revolution) and Georges Prevost (during the War of 1812), were named governors of Canada. Their French language and identity were essential to maintain order. Despite these crucial contributions, the religious and linguistic solitudes remained. No French Protestant worship was offered. Huguenots could either assimilate to English or join the French Catholic community. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,738
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,503

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,029
Tête enseignante GPT0,324
Écart entre enseignants0,296 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle