Relational and Spiritual Dimensions of Parental Grieving Les Dimensions relationnelles et spirituelles du deuil chez les parents
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Over past 20 years scholarly interest in role of spirituality in health and social sciences has increased significantly (Paloutzian & Park, 2013). Particular attention has been paid to role of spirituality in coping with a wide variety of health and mental health challenges (Pargament, 1997). One of most notable and consistent findings in this regard is that spirituality appears to be especially salient for those individuals who have been pushed to limits of their existence and who have encountered life-changing events, such as diagnosis of a cancer (Gall & Comblât, 2002) or death of a child (Klass, 1999).The topic of death in general, and death of a child in particular, is likely to invoke existential concerns in those who suffer from loss (Center for Advancement of Health, 2004). Qualitative and quantitative research programs have drawn attention to suffering of bereaved parents and explored ways in which they have attempted to cope with loss of their child and readjust their lives to fit this new and tragic reality (Murphy, Johnson, & Lohan, 2003). Most researchers and clinicians (Janzen, Cadell, & Westhues, 2003-2004) acknowledge that loss of a child is one of most devastating losses for parents, and that this loss puts parents at significant risk for physical and mental health problems, including increased suicidal ideation (Harper, O'Connor, Dickson, & O'Carroll, 2011; Murphy, Tapper, Johnson, & Lohan, 2003), higher levels of posttraumatic stress disorder as compared to normative populations (Murphy, 2008), increased risk of complicated or traumatic grief (Bennett, Litz, Sarnoff Lee, & Maguen, 2005), increased rates of depression and anxiety (Kreicbergs, Valdimarsdottir, Onelov, Henter, & Steinbeck, 2004), higher rates of paternal alcohol abuse (Vance, Boyle, Najman, & Thearle, 2002), increase in marital/relational disruption (Rogers, Floyd, Seltzer, Greenberg, & Hong, 2008), reduced sexual contact post loss (Dyregrov & Gjestad, 2011), and even an increased risk of mortality (Cohen-Mansfield, Shmotkin, Malkinson, Bartur, & Hazan, 2013; Li, Hansen Precht, Mortensen, & Olsen, 2003).One of main reasons for these health risks is that loss of a child is generally considered to be an unnatural event (Davies, 2004), an event that reverses biological order of birth and death and undermines parents' assumptive worlds (Christ, Bonanno, Malkinson, & Rubin, 2003; Hibberd, Vandenberg, & Wamser, 2011). Given that modern societies have largely banished death from consciousness (Greenberg, Koole, & Pyszczynski, 2004) and that modern medicine continues to chip away at ever-declining child mortality rates (Ahmad, Lopez, & Inoue, 2000), most parents do not expect to deal with loss of a child and are thus ill-prepared to cope with such a trauma (Prigerson, Vanderwerker, & Maciejewski, 2008). Furthermore, medical and spiritual communities often have relatively few resources to aid suffering parents (Massey, 2000), despite fact that many of major world religions explicitly deal with meaning of death, and that for some, such as Christianity, death of the son is central spiritual narrative (Klass & Goss, 1999). Many parents find themselves alone and at a significant loss about how to cope with such a devastating and all-encompassing crisis (D'Agostino, Berlin-Romalis, Jovcevska, & Barerra, 2008).One consistent theme that has emerged in clinical and research literature on child loss is that many parents cope with their loss through engaging their spiritual beliefs and practices (Attig, 1996). Researchers who have begun to explore ways in which spiritual resources may contribute to recovery from child loss have generally found them to function as a protective factor against complicated grief, contributing to adjustment and recovery process (Gillies & Neimeyer, 2006). …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».