MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1027312204

Interview with Keith Getty

2015· article· en· W1027312204 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brian Hehn

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Hymn · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiquePentecostalism and Christianity Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHymnGloryArtChoirGlobeWifeStanzaArt historyPerformance artHistoryTheologyLiteratureClassicsVisual artsPhilosophyPoetryPsychology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

When you hear the name Keith Getty, you may begin to hum the hymn ' In Christ alone. Number eleven on CCLI's top 25 list,1 In Christ Alone is Getty's most well-known and beloved hymn. Even if you haven't heard or sung In Christ alone, you may know it as the hymn which was the subject of several articles, interviews, and blog posts concerning its controversial inclusion in (or exclusion from) the new PCUSA hymnal, Glory to God. Co-written with Stuart Townend in 2001, the hymn has already found its way into seven hymnals, including Celebrating Grace and Lift Up Tour Hearts. However, this song was only a launching pad for Keith's hymn-writing career. Working together, Keith and his wife, Kristyn Getty, have been writing hymns for over a decade, while selling out churches and concert venues across the United States, Canada, and across the globe when they tour with their band. Their concerts always include congregational singing, drawing from both newly composed hymns and hymns from the church's tradition.Born and raised in Northern Ireland and now living in Nashville, Tennessee, Keith was formally trained as a musician at Durham University in the mid 1990s. He was introduced to the music industry by Sir James Galway, who intrigued with Getty's piano arrangements.2 With Galway's help, Keith quickly became a successful orchestrator and conductor, especially in the film industry. At the turn of the century, Keith was challenged by a pastor in Belfast to perhaps try and bring some of what the old hymns of the faith had brought to the Church through the centuries to the contemporary Church.3 It was then that he turned his professional attention to the song of the church. Quickly finding international success with In Christ alone, Keith has since been a unique voice in contemporary hymnody, combining praise-andworship styles with his Celtic and orchestral influences. The Gettys now have fourteen different hymns published in hymnals,4 five full-length albums, and over sixty hymns published electronically on their website.5It is because of his original musical style, intentional textwriting, and the frequency with which his hymns are used in churches across the United States and Canada that our President-Elect, Geoffrey Moore, and I sat down with Keith when he was in Dallas on tour in order to discuss his work as a hymnwriter and introduce him to the work of The Hymn Society. Energized by our conversation about The Society's work and hoping to continue our conversation about congregational song, Keith agreed to have the questions and answers published.BH: What inspired you to begin writing hymns?KG: I've always loved singing hymns and as a young, thoughtful Christian growing up at the beginning of a new millennium with so much opportunity and so many challenges for Christians, I realized the need for our generation to be able to articulate what we believe.BH: I noticed that you are very intentional when you say you write hymns, never songs. Why is that?KG: The hymn thing was originally the initiative of other people, but I was happy to adopt it since traditional hymns tend to follow the more historic patterns of church worship from the Old Testament to New Testament to church history. It's in this tradition where we find understanding our faith through congregational singing and passing songs down from generation to generation both attractive and a huge need.BH: Your performances are mostly in venues such as concert halls or large venues with a stage, yet you incorporate a substantial amount of singing by the audience. What is your experience with people singing together in venues that typically do not involve the audience in the performance (e.g., symphonies, recitals, operas, etc.)? Do those venues provide any unique challenges or positive surprises when it comes to group singing?KG: The Christmas Tour does frequent a number of concert halls and the concerts involve carol singing, which is deeply meaningful for churchgoers and at the very least a cultural experience for those who are outsiders of the faith. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,878
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,505

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,143
Tête enseignante GPT0,229
Écart entre enseignants0,086 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe HymnMême sujetPentecostalism and Christianity StudiesTravaux en français237 207