MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1030012564

Experimental study of fluid transport processes in the matrix system of organic rich shales

2014· article· en· W1030012564 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueRWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMatrix (chemical analysis)Oil shaleChemistryGeologyPetroleum engineeringPaleontologyChromatography
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The matrix permeability of organic-rich shales and its relationship with lithological factors including maturity, TOC (total organic carbon) content, porosity and mineralogy is fundamental to the process of shale oil/gas production from these unconventional reservoirs. The significances of these individual factors controlling matrix permeability are, however, rock-specific and not necessarily of equal importance in all shale gas reservoirs. The matrix permeability of fine-grained sedimentary rocks also depends on the type of permeating fluid, moisture content, pore pressure and effective stress. The effects of these controlling factors on matrix permeability of fine-grained organic-rich shales/mudstones, originating from different potential and producing shale gas plays worldwide (China, Canada, US), have been reviewed and discussed in Chapter 2. The lithotypes occurring in unconventional oil/gas reservoirs have low to extremely-low permeability coefficients which are difficult to measure in the laboratory on a routine basis. The routine experimental procedures applied for high-permeable samples should be verified and tested for these types of rocks. Chapter 3 compares different methodologies (steady state, non-steady state) for the determination of gas permeability coefficients in tight shale samples under controlled confining pressure. For the samples analyzed in this PhD study, the apparent gas permeability coefficients measured using non-steady state techniques were consistently higher than those measured by the steady state method (for dry samples). The Klinkenberg-corrected gas permeability coefficients obtained from steady state and non-steady state techniques were, however, similar but the slip-factors were different, being larger for the non-steady state technique. The Late Mississippian Upper Alum Shale/Chokier Formation (western Germany, Belgium), the Lower Toarcian Posidonia Shale (northern Germany) and the Cambro-Ordovician Scandinavian Alum Shale (Sweden, Denmark) are among the most promising candidates for shale gas production in Western Europe. The fluid transport properties within these potential shale gas reservoirs are, however, still poorly understood. Chapters 4-6 present results from laboratory studies investigating the fluid flow mechanisms/properties in the matrix system of these European organic-rich shales, differing in pore network characteristics (porosity, pore size distribution), mineralogy (calcite, clay, quartz), TOC content (3-14%) and maturity (0.6-2.4% VRr). Gas (He, Ar, CH4) and water flow properties were determined at effective stresses ranging between 5 and 37 MPa and temperatures of 45°C. The effects of different controlling factors/parameters including maturity, porosity, mineralogy, TOC (total organic carbon) content, permeating fluid, pore pressure and effective stress on the conductivity were analysed and discussed. Among the sample suite analyzed, the lowest permeability coefficients parallel and perpendicular to bedding were measured at intermediate maturity levels (oil-window; 0.88-1.05% VRr). The Klinkenberg-corrected gas permeability coefficients increased significantly with porosity (4-16%) ranging between 4•10 -22 and 9.7•10 -17 m². Permeability coefficients measured parallel to bedding were more than one order of magnitude higher than those measured perpendicular to bedding. The permeability anisotropy appeared, furthermore, to be controlled by the mineral composition. Permeability coefficients measured with He were consistently up to five times higher than those measured with Ar and CH4 under similar experimental conditions. A substantial discrepancy between Klinkenberg-corrected gas permeability coefficients and water permeability coefficients (0.5-10•10-21 m²) was observed for both immature and overmature samples. Klinkenberg-corrected gas (He, Ar, CH4) permeability coefficients measured on dry samples were significantly, up to six times, higher than those measured on as-received samples (moisture contents up to 1.9 wt%). The rate of permeability reduction with increasing effective stress depended significantly on orientation and moisture content. The reduction rate was, however, independent of the type of permeating gas (He, Ar, CH4). The most significant permeability reduction with effective stress was observed for as-received samples (moisture contents up to 1.9 wt%), compared to those, which were dried (105 °C, vacuum, overnight) before the tests.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,268
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,425

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,250
Écart entre enseignants0,235 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle