Higher education and the global marketplace from Malaysian experience
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Internationalisation and globalisation concepts in higher institution is now well established as a global phenomenon, especially in the major-English speaking nations such the USA, the UK, Australia, New Zealand and Canada (see Hemsley-Brown and Oplatka, 2006). Majorities of the higher institutions recognize that they need to market themselves in a climate of educational international competition. As the competition among them in the higher level and intensive activity, they increasingly behave as business entity by adopting more business strategies. In recent years, they have to promote the acceleration of international linkages, brand campuses, single purpose programs and other forms of transnational education and quality of education for the customers. HEIs that are able to learn about customers, competitors and regulators stand a better chance of sensing and acting upon events and trends in the marketplace (Tippins and Sohi, 2003). However, the task for all activities mentioned above is not always easy to remain competitive in the eye of customers at global environment. Other variables such as government intervention, international law, different custom procedures, variety of languages, foreign exchange, different costs, different behaviour and life styles became the challenges for higher institutions to providing a quality and sustainable education program. Paramewaran and Glowacka (1995) in their study of university image found that, higher education institutions (HEIs) need to maintain or develop a distinct image to create a competitive advantage in an increasingly competitive market. In a number of countries, governments have been at pains to stress the economic benefits resulting from higher education (Yorke, 1999). As we know, the education market is worth hundreds of billions of dollars in todays markets, and every week sees a new joint venture announced by traditional or new players all over the world, as they jockey for position in this increasingly global market. Malaysia in the 1980’s recognized that it would be unable to educate its own 6 percent of its population through its own institutions and began to partner with international institutions to supplement its system of higher education (Lenn, 2000). Further more in recent years, this move has led to the government invited foreign universities to operate on Malaysian soil. With the move, the government made another important decision, to turn Malaysia into an educational hub in the region. For both public and private HEIs, they have to take more ownership and responsibilities for the overall products and services that they offered to the customers. Therefore, many HEIs already adopted some form of business strategies especially in marketing for their strategic activities in their operations.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,008 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».