MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1044611064

A Review of Buddhism Goes to the Movies: Introduction to Buddhist Thought and Practice

2014· review· en· W1044611064 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
John Whalen‐Bridge

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of Buddhist Ethics · 2014
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueSoutheast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBuddhismBuddhist philosophyDozenGautama BuddhaSubject (documents)Quarter (Canadian coin)HistoryReligious studiesPhilosophyTheologyComputer scienceMathematicsLibrary science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Buddhism Goes to the Movies: Introduction to Buddhist Thought and Practice. By Ronald Green. New York: Routledge, 2014, 166 pages, ISBN: 9780415841481 (paperback), $34.95. Since 2003, when the first International Buddhist Film Festival was held in Los Angeles, there have been dozens of similar events around the world (Whalen-Bridge 5). The of exploring Buddhism through movies has since steadily increased, and similar events have been organized throughout the United States, in London, Amsterdam, Singapore, Calgary, Bangkok, Melbourne, Kuala Lumpur, and global cities. Popularizing Buddhism with the help of movies has also been on the rise in classrooms, and Ronald S. Green's Buddhism Goes to the Movies is an introductory text that describes the basics of Buddhist philosophy and practice (xi), especially those elements associated with Theravada, Pure Land, Zen, and Tantric Buddhism. Ten chapters discuss a dozen films in order to introduce students to some of the more prominent Buddhist sects, foundational concepts such as the Four Noble Truths, and contemporary issues such as gender disparities and the rise of Engaged Buddhism. Little or no knowledge of Buddhism is assumed at the outset, and the ten chapters can easily be considered units for a quarter or semester school term (xi). Buddhism Goes to the Movies is not a focused study of the dozen films listed in the table of contents. Rather, it shuttles between discussion of the films and the Buddhist background issues that the author connects to the films. The first chapter, Early Representations: Broken Blossoms and Lost Horizon, makes the point that Buddhism has been presented as an other to the Western imagination since the beginning of cinema history, and the chapter clearly explains the problem of orientalist representation. Interspersed with discussions of films by D. W. Griffith and Frank Capra, the reader will find glosses on the Dalai Lama, middle path, and loving kindness, emboldened terms that are explained in a little more detail in the glossary. These sidebar discussions of Buddhist elements are not always organically related to the direct discussions of the films as one might hope. After the first chapter, each chapter begins with a summary of the films in question, usually running about two pages, followed by an analysis of relevant themes. For example, the second chapter uses Club to explicate the Four Noble Truths. Green is not the only author to interpret the film Club in relation to Buddhism; Charley Reed has written an article on the subject, and David Harper and Richard Anderson have included discussion of the film in their book chapter. Green's argument follows Reed's Fight Club: An Exploration of Buddhism, in which a rather loose set of correlations is made between Buddhist topics (the Four Noble Truths, the Eightfold Path, the trikaya doctrine) and parts of the film. The narrator and main character Jack, dissatisfied with life, begins to attend various self-help groups, an activity which corresponds, according to Green (who follows Reed), to the four sights: old age, sickness, death, and then a renunciate. The film's audience eventually learns that Jack has all along been imagining Tyler, the charismatic figure who has led him to increasingly violent behavior. Without much recognition of the ways in which Buddhism and the ethos taught by the hallucinated guide Tyler diverge, Green proposes that the rules of Club, an activity in which men bash each back into a sense of grounded authenticity, are precepts of a sort. The apocalyptic/revolutionary plan Project Mayhem that concludes the film has five rules, recalling, argues Green, the Five Precepts of Buddhism: (1) You don't ask questions. (2) You don't ask questions. (3) No excuses. (4) No lies (which is also one of the Five Precepts), and (5) You have to trust Tyler, indicating the growing cult-like nature of the gatherings. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,035
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,085
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesMétarecherche
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,586
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0350,085
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0020,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,122
Tête enseignante GPT0,481
Écart entre enseignants0,359 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journal of Buddhist EthicsMême sujetSoutheast Asian Sociopolitical StudiesTravaux en français237 207