Sabah: Writer/Director Ruba Nadda's Timely Success in Connecting Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Canadian artists often draw inspiration from the vast expanse of land, an at times overwhelming and isolating natural setting that characterizes a country still self-creating, replete with possibilities. In comparison, Canadian writer/director Ruba Nadda in Sabah (2005), her first major film after a series of shorts, avoids broad external landscapes, drawing inspiration from primarily interior locales: homes, a swimming pool, a coffee shop, a workshop, a disco entrance, as well as intermittent panoramas of the Toronto skyline and select shots of city streets and parks. Within these urban settings, Nadda traverses infra- and i/tfer-culturally the sometimes difficult terrain separating family and community members. Working with established filmmaker Atom Egoyan, as executive co-producer, and Egoyan's spouse, award-winning actress Arsinee Khanjian, in the lead role of Sabah, along with other cast and crew members, Nadda has created a timely work that signals promising pathways for connecting Canada's increasingly diverse population. Focusing on the Arab Muslim immigrant family, in particular, Nadda, who is herself of Syrian/Palestinian descent, sets her film in Toronto, a notably diverse city with a sizeable Arab Muslim population. In portraying issues related to this community, Nadda engages with Canada's evolving--and debated--multicultural vision. Currently, the Canadian government (at the federal and provincial levels) seeks to assure the various ethnic and religious communities in Canada that they are welcome and encouraged to extol their heritage while at the same time recognize the common values they share with other citizens and residents in a democratic society. Canada was, in fact, in 1988, the first country to pass a national Multiculturalism Act, which recognizes as a fundamental characteristic of Canadian society with an integral role in the decision-making process of the federal government.... [The Act] sought to assist in the preservation of culture and language, to reduce discrimination, to enhance awareness and understanding, and to promote culturally sensitive institutional change at the federal level (Dewing and Leman 6-7). Furthermore, in an effort to accommodate cultural distinctiveness and equality, the Act specified the right of all to identify with the heritage of their choice, yet retain 'full and equitable participation ... in all aspects of Canadian society' (7). Fourteen years later, in 2002, the government declared June 27th as Canadian Multiculturalism Day. In 2005, the government introduced an action plan to strengthen social cohesion, further Canada's human rights framework and demonstrate federal leadership in the fight against racism and hate-motivated crime (9). Also in 2005 Canada signed the UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions: The Convention recognizes that books, films, television programs, and other goods and services have a distinctive nature that goes beyond their commercial value. It also reaffirms the right of countries to take measures to foster diverse expressions (9). It is thus not surprising that Nadda received funding for making Sabah from Telefilm Canada, a Crown Corporation of the federal government. However, positive as Canada's stated goals are, the official vision of a mosaic has not gone unchallenged. Some critics assess that it has created a separatist mentality ethnic groups rather than an integrated state; others fear that core Canadian values, culture and identity, along with the country's history, are being lost. Meanwhile, defenders of Canada's approach to multiculturalism argue that it encourages integration by telling immigrants they do not have to choose between preserving their heritage and participating in Canadian society. Rather, they can do both (11). Ruba Nadda's film, Sabah, supports the latter viewpoint, with the proviso that one should feel free to bend and adapt inherited norms in order to strike a reasonable balance between worlds. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».