Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Neonatal hearing screening programs (NHSP) have been widely implemented in the United States of America, Canada, Britain, and many European countries. Australia also began implementing such programs in some states in 2001 (Australian Consensus on Neonatal Hearing Screening, 2001). The ultimate goal of neonatal hearing screening is early identification and intervention for children with hearing loss. There have been many studies undertaken concerning the outcomes of NHSPs. For example, establishing and monitoring the referral and follow-up rates for those infants who fail the initial hearing screening test is often used as the primary measure of the program's success. However, other outcome measures such as parent satisfaction with NHSPs have been recommended to evaluate the success of these programs. Assessing parent satisfaction with these programs remains a largely neglected area, with very few investigations conducted to date. Therefore, the primary aim of the present study was to investigate parent satisfaction with a NHSP. Another aim was to develop a valid and reliable questionnaire (Parent Satisfaction Questionnaire with a Neonatal Hearing Screening Program; PSQ-NHSP) to measure parent satisfaction in this context. One hundred and sixty-six questionnaires were distributed during the 5-month data collection period to parents whose children received neonatal hearing screening at the Hear and Say Centre, Brisbane. Of these, 80 questionnaires (48%) were returned. Results indicated that the majority of parents were satisfied with the overall services provided. Parents also demonstrated high levels of satisfaction with the three dimensions of satisfaction in the PSQ-NHSP; information, personnel in charge of hearing testing, and appointment activities. The newly developed PSQ-NHSP was analysed for validity and reliability. Content validity of the PSQ-NHSP was partially established by reviewing available literature on parent satisfaction studies in other paediatric health care service programs in the identification of dimensions of satisfaction for the PSQ-NHSP. Construct validity of the PSQ-NHSP was indicated by significant positive relationship between overall satisfaction and the three specific dimensions in the questionnaire. The PSQ-NHSP demonstrated excellent internal consistency reliability (reliability coefficient = 0.94) and excellent test-retest reliability (p = 0.97). In conclusion, this study has contributed preliminary information about measuring parent satisfaction with the provision of NHSPs. The satisfaction questionnaire was found to be a useful instrument for identifying service shortfalls and areas for service improvements. Routine use of parent satisfaction assessment in other NHSPs is recommended.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».