MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W104843166

Gender Differences in the Academic Performance and Retention of Undergraduate Engineering Majors.

2012· article· en· W104843166 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueCollege student journal · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueEngineering Education and Pedagogy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHoganPsychologyBachelorPersonalityWorkforceAcademic achievementHigher educationPopulationEngineering educationBig Five personality traitsConscientiousnessSocial psychologyMedical educationMathematics educationDemographyEngineeringPolitical scienceSociologyMedicineExtraversion and introversion
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This study examined the role of academic performance factors, and personality traits as measured by the Hogan Personality Inventory (Hogan & Hogan, 2007), in the academic success and retention of undergraduate engineering majors. With regard to academic performance, the academic measures of ACT score and high school GPA were significantly related to second semester GPA for both genders. Personality measures also played a role for both genders with higher GPA's associated with more prudence and less sociability. However, these same academic factors and traits were significantly related to the retention of the male but not the female engineering undergraduates. It may be that females engineering majors make a stronger commitment to pursuing a degree in this non-traditional field before entering college such that these factors have less predictive power with regard to their retention in college. ********** As the United States progresses towards an increasingly technological workforce, a major problem for the country is the fact that the demand for the domestic capacity in engineering and computer fields is projected to exceed supply (Cosentino de Cohen & Deterding, 2009). The U.S. is changing rapidly in gender ratios related to education and employment. Females are now attending college at higher rates than ever before, having made up over half of the undergraduate population since 1981 (Fiegener, 2008). Although the number of women in undergraduate engineering programs has increased steadily since 1971, when they earned less than 1% of the bachelor's degrees in engineering, they continue to be underrepresented in this field, earning only 19.5 % of the bachelor's degrees in engineering in 2006 (Fiegener, 2008). Recent employment trends indicate that women will soon cross the threshold and become the majority of the American workforce (The Economist, 2010, p.7). Thus, having small numbers of women graduating with degrees in the fields of greatest national need at a time when there are so many women in U.S. colleges and universities and holding down paying jobs in the U.S. represents a critical problem for the culture. An increased understanding of the factors that contribute to the retention of women in fields such as engineering in the United States would, indeed, be in the best interest of our country and its future. College and universities throughout the U.S. have been concerned for many years with factors associated with retention of students at their institutions. Despite efforts of 4-year institutions of higher learning to carefully select students based on criteria associated with success, as many as 26% of students withdrew from college after their freshman year (ACT, 2008). A number of individual factors have been examined with regard to retention in general including academic orientation (Davidson & Beck, 2006), gender (Leppel, 2002), and personality traits (Lounsbury, Saudargas & Gibson, 2004; Martin, Montgomery, & Saphian, 2006; Taylor, Scepansky, Lounsbury, & Gibson, 2010). Leppel's (2002) national study of gender differences in college persistence of men and women showed GPA and family income had a positive impact on both men's and women's persistence. Larose, Ratelle, Guay, Senecal, Harvey, and Drouin (2008) studied gender differences in the roles of individual motivation and parental and teacher support in the retention of undergraduate STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) majors in 24 colleges in Quebec, Canada. Their five-year longitudinal study found no gender differences in overall persistence but differences in trajectories for men and women students. Measures of individual motivation showed that it was the women students who had the stronger feelings of self-determination and academic involvement and attachment. The only gender differences Larose et al. found in the role played by sociomotivational factors in students' persistence was a significant difference between persistent and non-persistent male students: persisting males showed higher levels of feelings of competence, self-determination, academic involvement and academic attachment than did non-persisting male students. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,029
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,256

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,038
Tête enseignante GPT0,283
Écart entre enseignants0,245 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle