MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W105629570 · doi:10.1093/pch/12.8.657

Promoting skill-building in cultural competence: A must for paediatricians who care for socially vulnerable populations

2007· article· en· W105629570 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Saleem Razack

Notice bibliographique

RevuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueChild and Adolescent Health
Établissements canadiensMcGill University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésImmigrationPovertyForeign bornMiamiCultural diversityPopulationEconomic growthEthnic groupHealth careUnemploymentCultural competenceHealth equityDiversity (politics)Political scienceGeographyMedicineEnvironmental health

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The demographics of Canadian society have evolved significantly over the past 40 years. The switch in immigration policy from a geopolitical quota-based system to a points-based system of immigration in the mid-1960s has contributed to an unprecedented cultural and ethnic diversity in this country. There is increasing recognition among health science educators that there is a specific skill set that tomorrow's (and today's) health care professionals will require to practice effectively in this exciting new reality. Canada's largest city, Toronto, Ontario, is second in the world after Miami (USA) in having the largest number of foreign-born residents on earth (43.7% at the 2001 census; the geographical origins of Toronto's foreign-born are much more diverse than in Miami) (1). Immigration has contributed to the significant cultural diversity that exists in all major urban centres in Canada, and newly arrived Canadians are often faced with downward mobility that increases the risk of marginalization through poverty (30% of immigrants versus 21.6% of all Canadians were living below the poverty line in 1995) (2). Canada's First Nations peoples represent another important, culturally diverse and severely marginalized population. Significant and discouraging health status disparities are well-documented among these diverse cultural groups (reviewed and referenced below). These populations are not only affected by geographical isolation, but also by chronic poverty, under- or unemployment, substance use and abuse, and limited opportunities for education and social advancement (to give but a few examples of observed social determinants of health among Aboriginal populations in Canada) (3). It is, thus, important to recognize that the efficacious medical practitioner who cares for populations that are socially vulnerable and marginalized by poverty needs competence in caring for patients from a diverse set of backgrounds, including cultural and socioeconomic diversity. As paediatricians, we have long recognized that children fundamentally exist within the context of a family and a community, and that practicing effectively in the care of children means incorporating these realities into therapeutic decision-making. If we are to train tomorrow's paediatricians to care and advocate for Canada's most vulnerable children and to view working toward eliminating health care delivery biases as a part of the social accountability of the profession, we will need to promote the development of skills in negotiating culture in the clinical encounter, as well as an understanding of broader issues, such as discrimination and bias, in the way health care is experienced by marginalized populations such as our oldest (First Nations) and newest (recently arrived Canadians) cultural groups. Patients and populations exist within defined historical, geopolitical and social contexts. The health care disparities of Canada's First Nations peoples, whose marginalization and exclusion are the products of a history of aggressive colonization, need to be understood by practitioners as having root causes in these contexts, such that these may be properly addressed. Increased rates of diseases such as type 2 diabetes mellitus, suicide and accidental injury are well-documented among Canada's First Nations peoples (4). If this were the “Australian Journal of Infants and Children”, the exact same list could be reported as pertinent to the health of Australia's Aboriginal populations (3). Canadian and Australian Aboriginal peoples share similar colonization histories, but could not be more distant, lineage-wise and climate-wise. Less well-documented in Canada have been issues related to institutional discrimination and health care delivery biases. Yoshida et al (5), in a study of liver transplant rates among the British Columbia Aboriginal population, have demonstrated significant differences in the rates of offering liver transplant to Aboriginal patients in comparison with others, to give a particularly poignant example of such a bias. Without implying that Aboriginal experience can (or should) be compared with the process of immigration (both quantitatively and qualitatively), there are commonalities to the process of migration that can also promote marginalization and health care disparities for new Canadians. Downward mobility (eg, nonrecognition of credentials), language barriers, loss of social supports and cultural ‘upheaval’, and discrimination are well-documented factors that can diminish socioeconomic potential and can promote poverty among newly arrived immigrant groups (6); this demographic is of huge numerical significance in Canada. Training curricula around culture for health care professionals should, thus, explicitly address these broader societal issues including institutional discrimination, power and hierarchy, and barriers to access experienced by marginalized populations. When considering incorporating cultural training in any curriculum of training for paediatric residents, it is important to address the skeptic viewpoint. Inevitably the question, “Does this make a difference?” will be asked, and rightly so, because our training programs are bursting at the seams with multiple curricular priorities. Much scholarly work is available linking culturally sensitive practice to health outcomes. There is evidence that the culturally sensitive practitioner will have: A more satisfied patient; A patient more likely to adhere to therapies proposed; and A more complete history from a patient (7,8). The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, which accredits specialty residency training in Canada, recognizes the importance of cultural sensitivity to effective practice. Sensitivity to diversity is seen as a core professional value, effective sharing of information with patients of diverse backgrounds is seen as a core communicator skill, and understanding culture as a factor in the doctor-patient interaction that contributes to health outcomes is seen as core medical expertise for the specialty physician in Canada (9). Frameworks for ‘cultural competence’ in medical training generally involve a set of skills to foster awareness of different understandings of health, sickness and the body among different cultural groups and, crucially, the ability to view biomedicine as a ‘cultural’ entity that can be critically analyzed and examined. Explicitly, training about the impact of culture on patients' experience of disease and health is not about the development of ‘trait-lists’ of the dominant characteristics of the various cultural groups encountered in one's practice (eg, ‘X patients are stoic in their pain behaviours’, or ‘Y patients have long pauses in conversation with the doctor’), because this ‘cultural encyclopedia’ approach can lead to unwitting stereotyping for individuals from a particular culture who do not share its dominant beliefs or behaviours with respect to a specific issue. To be sure, normative beliefs and behaviours of particular cultures encountered in practice are important to know, but the skill-building required to be effective would dictate that these ‘traits’ be applied as hypotheses only, and not hard and fast rules that apply to all members of a particular culture. Culhane-Pera et al (10) have proposed a developmental model for the cultural training of health care professionals, which emphasizes skill acquisition across the continuum of medical training. They further elaborated the goals of cultural training for health care professionals into a useful framework of knowledge, skills and attitudes, as seen in Figure 1. Key competencies in the developmental model for the cultural training of health care professionals. Adapted from reference 10 This framework can easily be adapted and contextualized to specific training milieus, such as a paediatric residency program. It would be important to ensure that this training occurs even in regions where there is much less multicultural presence. In such settings, program directors may need to be more creative in ensuring learning opportunities. Broadly, activities in cultural training for residents, students and health care professionals in general should focus on: Developing the learner's capacity for reflection as the basic skill building process required for effectiveness in practice; Fostering activities that allow the learner to see him or herself as a cultural entity in the clinical encounter in addition to his or her patient; and Exposure to broader issues of discrimination and marginalization experienced by cultural groups in encounters with the health care system. Ideally, the training should be grounded in the clinical encounter (implied here is the importance of faculty development in any cultural training program), with didactic or interactive sessions reinforcing the clinical reality by building reflective practice capacity. Figure 2 shows an example of an exercise where participants are asked to focus on themselves as human beings with identities. In debriefing this exercise, participants are able to reflect on themselves as cultural beings, on the complex nature of identity itself, and on the multiple identities that their patients bring to clinical encounters. Sample reflective exercise – the complex nature of identity There are many teaching modalities that can be used to enhance residents' and students' learning outside of the clinical encounter; these have been summarized by Pedersen (11) and are presented in adapted form in Figure 3. Teaching strategies for promoting cultural competency. Adapted from reference 11 Tomorrow's paediatricians will be increasingly called on to have skills for effective practice in a diverse demographical milieu. Training for this reality will prepare them well for practice in this environment if it emphasizes skill building through reflection, and an understanding that while knowledge about cultural groups encountered in practice is important, unwitting stereotyping may occur if this knowledge is applied unsophisticatedly. Finally, we must inculcate the values of confronting health care inequities and discrimination for marginalized populations as a professional imperative integral to our social responsibility toward society.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,010
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,034
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,242
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,482

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0100,034
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0130,009
Communication savante0,0080,007
Science ouverte0,0040,018
Intégrité de la recherche0,0070,021
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0100,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,044
Tête enseignante GPT0,416
Écart entre enseignants0,372 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations6
Publié2007
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePaediatrics & Child HealthMême sujetChild and Adolescent HealthTravaux en français237 207