The Underground Railroad in the Hudson River Valley: A Succinct Historical Composite
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
INTRODUCTION: ABOLITIONISM, BLACK ABOLITIONISTS AND THE UNDERGROUND RAILROAD-AN ADJUSTED VIEW OF THROUGH A GLASS DARKLY antebellum period one of most formidable challenges posed nation and nefarious business in human chattel it protected under guise of private property, was that of abolitionism. It was a movement for immediate and total dismantling of institution of slavery. The challenge was made even more formidable because of movement's involvement in clandestine operations of one of slavery's effective nemesis, Underground Railway. The operations were of kind in which many participated but few took time fathom meaning behind such operations beyond that of freedom. What, therefore, was Underground Railroad? On one hand Underground Railroad was really a moral challenge posed a nation that defended an immoral institution. On other hand, and in words of one writer, Underground Railroad was a route, but a net-work; not an organization, but a of of banded for deliberate purpose of depriving their southern neighbors of their property [in defiance of law]. (2) It was like a ferment beneath surface of southern society, (3) and was at core of country's moral dilemma. So much so that as a formidable force it challenged an ignominious fugitive slave law, and eventually brought on Civil War and destruction of slavery. (4) Who were those thousands of banded together in a conspiracy against slavery? Adjacent Hudson River and its environs many of morally committed were undoubtedly coconspirators in secretive operations of Underground Railroad. Unfortunately, because of some glitch in historical methodology, our view of those thousands of people is as through a glass darkly. The of Underground Railroad that has come down us has been more about the bravery and daring of [the slave's] abettors than enslaved. (5) paraphrasing Larry Gara, author of book, The Liberty Line The legend of Underground Railroad, one is left wondering if without those white abettors would many escaped slaves have successfully made their way Canada and other points north? (6) For example, it is recorded that some fugitives were not even aware of a committed group referred as In 1841 Joseph Struge, a British abolitionist traveler, met a fugitive couple on a boat going from New York Albany. They had escaped by railway and steamboat, carrying forged passes. Sturge learned that they had never head of vigilance committees that existed to facilitate escape of runaway (7) More contemporary, revisionist writers have cleared up through a glass darkly by, for one, dissipating shroud of mist that obscured our view of participatory role of free northern Blacks in rescue of fugitive slaves. The writings of revisionist historian Benjamin Quarles, in particular his seminal study Black Abolitionists, contributes a sharpening of that participatory role; a role that formerly was relegated margins of history. (8) words of C. Vann Woodward these black abolitionists [were] crowded off-stage by [white] abolitionists. (9) And with respect legend of Underground as a melodrama, and usurpation of center-stage position, Woodward wrote: One very human thing authors of melodrama did was seize spotlight. They elected themselves heroes. It was not that abolitionists attempted stage Othello without princely Moor, but they did relegate Moor a subordinate role. The role assigned him was largely passive-that of trembling, helpless fugitive completely dependent on his noble benefactors. The abolitionist was clearly hero, and as Gerrit Smith, one of them, put it, thing was bought off by 'Abolitionists and Abolitionists only. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».