Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Dr. Wilen’s experience of 15 years with the Pediatric Psychopharmacology Clinic and Research Program at Massachusetts General Hospital informs this interesting and useful book. Although it is directed to parents, it will help experienced practitioners to review their own attitudes and strategies when advising parents about the possible use of medication for their children. It will help residents and newly graduated child psychiatrists understand the intricacies and obstacles that can impede a seemingly straightforward and evidence-based recommendation for medication. Parents seeking an assessment of their child’s emotional or behavioural problems are likely to be struggling with many myths and misconceptions. They have fears related to the still current stigma surrounding psychiatric problems, have likely been accused of poor parenting, have probably been told “he’ll grow out of it,” and may have already amassed a wealth of advice from friends, relatives, media and the internet. They may be adamantly opposed to the use of medication under any circumstances or desperately seeking medication as a quick fix. “Straight talk” comprises three sections. The initial section encompasses basic information about psychotropic medications and their uses, the psychopharmacological evaluation, the diagnosis and treatment plan, and the essential collaboration between parents and practitioner. In addition, a question and answer format is used to address parents’ most frequently asked questions. The second section addresses common childhood psychiatric disorders, and the third describes the various classes of psychotropic medication. The approach is balanced, biopsychosocial, avoids parent blaming, and in the author’s own words (page 3) is “by no means an advertisement for psychiatric medications.” The book is written in plain language with definitions of all the medical and psychiatric terms used. Much practical advice is included. For instance: how to help your youngster accept an evaluation, and parents’ responsibility for keeping medications safe. If you recommend this book to Canadian parents, you will need to point out its drawbacks. They can ignore helpful hints for surviving the U.S. medical system, such as tips about insurance and co-payments. Some of the information is not up-to-date. In particular, information about SSRIs is contradictory, probably hurriedly added as the book went to press. I tend to recommend the first section to parents wanting to gain some basic understanding of the rationale for prescribing medication to children, the process of assessment and treatment, and their constructive collaboration with the prescribing doctor. Sections two and three will also be helpful in most cases, but may need further discussion and updating.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».