MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1123396362

Detecting pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in surface water from the Grand River watershed: An evaluation and comparison of methods

2008· dissertation· en· W1123396362 sur OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Bo Cheyne

Notice bibliographique

RevueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2008
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueYersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Water NetworkOntario Ministry of Health and Long-Term CarePublic Health AgencyPublic Health Agency of Canada
Mots-clésYersinia enterocoliticaWatershedSurface waterHydrology (agriculture)Environmental scienceBiologyGeologyComputer scienceEnvironmental engineeringMachine learningBacteriaGeotechnical engineering
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Yersinia enterocolitica are potentially pathogenic bacteria transmitted through the fecal oral route. Typical disease symptoms include those associated with gastrointestinal disease, although infection can also lead to more serious and invasive illnesses, particularly in sensitive populations. Previous surveys have detected Y. enterocolitica in surface water in various parts of the world, and studies have found drinking untreated water to be a possible risk factor for Y. enterocolitica infection. 
\n
\nMethods available for the detection of Y. enterocolitica have been developed primarily for food and clinical samples and have not been tested extensively with water. More commonly used methods include culture based isolation of Yersinia spp. and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based detection of Y. enterocolitica. Reports suggest that culture based methods available for the isolation of Y. enterocolitica may not be effective for environmental samples. Strain isolation using culture based methods is important, so that further subtyping information can be obtained for epidemiological investigations. In contrast, PCR based detection is more rapid, of higher throughput, can be highly specific and can target pathogenic strains within a species. 
\n
\nThe overall objective of this work was to evaluate culture based and PCR based methods for the detection of Y. enterocolitica in water, and to examine its prevalence in the Grand River watershed in Southwestern Ontario, Canada. Surface water in this watershed is used to provide all or part of the drinking water for approximately 500,000 people, as well as for recreational purposes. It is also one of the most heavily impacted watersheds in Canada by both agricultural and urban activities.
\n
\nCulture based studies compared two selective agars and four enrichment broths. Results showed that Cefsulodin Irgasan Novobiocin (CIN) agar and modified tryptic soy broth (mTSB) had greater potential for recovering Y. enterocolitica from surface water. Consequently, enrichment in mTSB followed by growth on CIN agar was used to isolate Yersinia from the Grand River. Yersinia strains were isolated from 52 out of 200 (26 %) surface water samples collected over a 17 month period. No seasonal trends were observed in isolation rates. Species isolated were typically considered to be non pathogenic species, although recent evidence suggests they may have potential virulence to humans. The majority of these strains have been found by other groups in surveys of aquatic environments.
\n
\nPCR methods developed targeted two Y. enterocolitica virulence genes: the ail gene, located in chromosomal DNA; and the yad A gene, located on a virulence plasmid. In surface water collected from the Grand River, the ail gene target was detected in 121 samples out of 319 (38 %) over a 29 month period and the yadA gene target was detected in 44 samples out of 206 (21 %) over a 20 month period. Both genes were detected more frequently when the water temperatures were colder. PCR-based studies conducted were quantitative, which has not previously been done with water samples. The median and maximum concentrations in samples positive for the ail gene were 40 and 2,000 cells/100 mL, and in samples positive for the yadA gene were 32 and 3,276 gene copies/100 mL, respectively. 
\n
\nOverall results demonstrated that culture based methods are less sensitive than PCR based detection methods for specific detection of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica, suggesting that previous culture based surveys may have underestimated their potential prevalence. Furthermore, potentially pathogenic Y. enterocolitica may be present in the Grand River watershed. While Y. enterocolitica is relatively easily inactivated by traditional disinfection methods used in drinking water treatment processes, it is possible their presence poses a concern for recreational users and individuals drinking untreated water. This study suggests that further investigation is necessary to evaluate possible health risks associated with the occurrence of potentially pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in the Grand River.
\n
\nThis work assists with the development of methods and information gathering for an emerging waterborne pathogen that has not been surveyed in the Grand River watershed, nor quantitatively surveyed in any water previously. Findings provide important information for drinking water providers and public health investigations.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,117
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,992

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,319
Écart entre enseignants0,289 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2008
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Même sujetYersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites researchTravaux en français237 207