MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W112838840

13 Retro Keywords ... and Why They're Worth a Second Look

2004· article· en· W112838840 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Clint Burnham

Notice bibliographique

RevueEnglish studies in Canada · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueMedia, Communication, and Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEpistemologyIdealismTRACE (psycholinguistics)ConceptualismSociologyPoliticsContext (archaeology)HegelianismMaterialismPhilosophyAestheticsHistoryLawLinguisticsPolitical science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Art In what follows would like to examine the changing meanings and usages of the term (as well as the concept art) since Raymond Williams encapsulated its historical etymologies and political contexts in Keywords. Such a re-examination necessitates, think, a consideration of Williams's method in the 1970s, and what his materialism means or how it functions today. His conclusions regarding the status of must be placed in a historical context vis-a-vis twentieth-century Critical Theory and Marxism, for Williams's ideas inform or reproduce or anticipate the art world conceptualism of such theorists as Arthur C. Danto and Pierre Bourdieu. Williams's technique in Keywords was to trace a material history of words' meanings in usage. Or, rather, he was interested in words that contained in their history a conflict that was symptomatic of larger struggles. His most important methodological statement in Keywords may be where he links the semantic and the social: the issues could not all be understood simply by analysis of the words. On the contrary, most of the social and intellectual issues, including both gradual developments and the most explicit controversies and conflicts, persisted within and beyond the linguistic analysis. Yet many of these issues, found, could not really be thought through, and some of them, believe, cannot even be focused unless we are conscious of the words as elements of the problems. (16) Here we see Williams veering between the Scylla and Charybdis of twentieth-century Marxism: economism vs. idealism. At one extreme, we have the economism of Stalin, and at the other, cultural studies. (1) idealism in Williams is that which stretches from semiotics to cultural studies: by which Imean stressing the necessity of the letter, of the word. But Williams is hardly some Brit naif His semiotics comes via Volosinov/Bakhtin, (2) and thus he locates his idealism in a class situation: I was given the impression ... that these [differing uses of culture] arose mainly from the fact of an incomplete education (16). Williams's bourgeois interlocutor assumed people using the word culture in an anthropological sense were merely scholarship boys. William's sense of class struggle is also to be found in the anecdote which opens Keywords' Introduction, the origin if you will of the text: his return to Cambridge after military service (in a tank! like Billy Bragg!) during World War n. William's narratives are relevant because they place in a historical situation his methodology: looking at the meaning of keywords as a symptom of class struggle. This technique resolves momentarily the great Saussurean binary of synchrony and diachrony. For, while Williams never makes the historicist or of arguing that we know the etymology of the word when we use ft now, we are nonetheless using a word that arrives sedimented in those moments of dissension. As well, Williams is quite Bakhtinian in that he avoids Saussure's idealism by situating words in the moment of the utterance. i.e., the class structure that obtains to academic speech genres or habitaus. In Mikhail Bakhtin's essay The Problem of Speech Genres (60-102), not available in the West until the 1908, speech genres are conceived of at the level of the utterance, which exists in a social situation with the listener, much as the speaker, integral to the process (since utterances are marked or framed by a change in speaking subject). As we will see below, such a dialectical theory of the use of language is particularly pertinent in the case of art, which exists in a similar binary relationship between the aesthete and the philistine-or what Adorno, using an imperial vocabulary, called the barbarian (r-44). In spite of all this heady pedigree, or, rather, because of it, Williams's method is no longer radical; it has become mainstream even while its politics, and its theory, have been dropped. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,227
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,428

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,037
Tête enseignante GPT0,308
Écart entre enseignants0,271 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEnglish studies in CanadaMême sujetMedia, Communication, and EducationTravaux en français237 207