MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1131989687

Living in Limbo with Hope: Sudanese Refugees and Social Injustice in Egypt

2015· article· en· W1131989687 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Teresa A. Booker

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of Pan-African Studies · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGlobal Peace and Security Dynamics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRefugeeInjusticeContext (archaeology)SociologyEconomic JusticeCriminologyGender studiesLawMedia studiesPolitical scienceHistory
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Adam, Gamal A. Living in Limbo with Hope: Sudanese Refugees and Social Injustice in Egypt. Vernon, B.C. Canada: J. Charlton Publishing Ltd., 2014, ISBN: 978-09919441-3-2, pp.232; reviewed by Teresa A. Booker (tbooker@jjay.cuny.edu), Assistant Professor, Department of Africana Studies, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, New York.One need not look further than the nightly news to see waves of African immigrants risking life and limb for the safety of European shores. Men, women, and children are plucked from sinking boats and guided to dry land where they huddle, at least for a while, in foil blankets waiting to be processed at some intake center where they can plea for crossing an international border into safety are steps away from a new life, Gamal Adam's Living in Limbo with Hope: Sudanese Refugees and Social Injustice in Egypt will be an eye opener.Dr. Gamal Adam-himself a Darfurian and former refugee-turned doctorate-earning, social anthropologist-uses his position as an insider to draw attention to the plight of Sudanese refugees living a life of limbo in Cairo, Egypt. Field notes collected during August 2003-June 2004 as both an observer of everyday activities from weddings to parties to prayers and snowball sampler interviewing people and groups as fate led him to them make a compelling argument for the need to expose the unfortunate treatment of people.Before explaining the current conditions of Sudanese refugees in Egypt, Adam first provides some historical context to the relationship between African refugees and the African countries that neighbor their native land. For example, prior to the mid-1970s, East African nations like Egypt were very generous towards refugees [but] the generosity gradually disappeared as the numbers grew. When the al-Bashir took control over Sudan by means of a coup (and allowed the scorched earth campaign that caused Darfurians to flee), Adams says that the Egyptian government was the first to recognize the new Sudanese government rather than condemn it.Moreover, despite ratifying conventions meant to protect the rights of refugees and ostensibly extending those rights to domestic policy, there is considerable discrepancy between the Egyptian government's affirmations that they have always welcomed refugees with open arms since the days of Joseph and his brethren, and assurances that the Koran specifically enjoins Muslims to enter Egypt with confidence, and what they have actually delivered in terms of providing political asylum to the Sudanese. (p. 63)Adam next explains that the granting of refugee status to Sudanese is based on both macro- and micro- factors. On the macro level, for example, the UNHCR convinced Egypt to temporarily halt for 18 months the arrest and deportation of asylum-seekers just beginning the petition process. However, not only did the Egyptian government ignore the yellow card system for temporary refugees agreed upon with UNCHR, but it disregarded, as well, the blue card system the government itself had already put in place to identify individuals whose completed petitions were already awaiting review phase prior to the UNHCR's intervention. On the micro level, Adam explains how the determination of refugee status is based on a refugee's persuasiveness in presenting their case to interviewing officials as well as the official's degree of familiarity with the situation in the refugee's country of origin. Due to red tape and political bias, asylum-seekers in Cairo waited, on average, 9 months only to be denied asylum in the end.The only topic upon which the UNHCR and the Egyptian government both agree is that refugees should be forced to stay in one camp or location (p.20). Not only does it make them easier to numerate, but it minimizes the hostile actions frequently directed towards immigrants, who are often accused of taking jobs away from the host country citizens, the Egyptians. Adam does not make clear how and under what conditions individuals were allowed exit the designated spaces and enter into Cairo proper. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,061
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,121

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,006
Communication savante0,0050,005
Science ouverte0,0010,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,043
Tête enseignante GPT0,350
Écart entre enseignants0,307 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journal of Pan-African StudiesMême sujetGlobal Peace and Security DynamicsTravaux en français237 207