MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1137612012 · doi:10.1201/9781439800959

Standards, Conformity Assessment, and Accreditation for Engineers

2009· book· en· W1137612012 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typebook
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueSafety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAccreditationConformity assessmentConformityEngineering ethicsEngineeringPolitical scienceMedical educationMedicineOperations managementLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

ISO/IEC Guide 2 Standardization and Related Activities-General Vocabulary Introduction ISO/IEC 17000 Conformity Assessment-Vocabulary and General Principles Introduction Bibliography References Standards The Economic Benefits of Standardization Anatomy of a Standard Variations on a Theme Modularity in Standards Descriptive Provisions versus Performance Provisions in Standards Good Standards versus Bad Standards Other Types of and Names for Standards Not Identified in ISO/IEC Guide 2 Codes and Other Pre-Regulation Standards Applications of Standards Abuses of Standards The Life Cycle of a Standard References Standards Development Introduction Classical Methods Consortia and Similar Methods of Standard Setting Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Methods Conclusions Accreditation of Conformity Assessment Bodies (CABs)-ISO/IEC 17011 Introduction Example of an Accreditation System in the United States Outline of the Requirements of ISO/IEC 17011 Connections between Standards for Vocabulary, Conformity Assessment, Accreditation, and Other Applicable Standards and Documents Summary International Standards, Conformity Assessment, and Accreditation What Is an International Standard? Why International Standards? International Standards Need to be Globally Relevant Conformity Assessment in International Trade The Principal International Standards Organizations: ISO, IEC, and ITU Overview of Standards, Conformity Assessment, and Accreditation Bodies Common Elements of the ISO and the IEC ISONET and the International Classification for Standards (ICS) The Standards Development Stage Codes An Example of the Project Stage Codes The ISO The IEC The ITU Regional Standards and Conformity Assessment Introduction European Union Regional Standards and Conformity Assessment in Other Areas Concluding Remarks National Standards, Conformity Assessment, and Accreditation Bodies Introduction: Do Unique National Standards Have a Future? Standards, Conformity Assessment, and Accreditation in the United States Some Representative US Bodies for Non-ICT Standards and Conformity Assessment Some Representative US Bodies for ICT Standards and Conformity Assessment Standards, Conformity Assessment, and Accreditation in Canada Standards and Conformity Assessment in Japan Standards and Conformity Assessment in Germany Provincial (State) and Local Standards and Conformity Assessment Introduction The National Electrical Code (NEC) Model Building Codes Adopted by States State Highway Standards The MTBE Fiasco: State Standards Leading Federal Standards State's Departments of Agriculture States Have Options on ICT Standards Legal Issues in Standards and Conformity Assessment Introduction Products Liability of Manufacturers and Others McDonnell and Miller, Inc. Caper Indian Head, Inc. v. Allied Tube and Conduit Corporation and the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) National Cooperative Research Act (NCRA) of 1984 (P.L. 98-462) Standards Development Organization Advancement Act (SDOAA) of 2004 (P.L. 108-237) Civil Liability of Standards Developers Standards and Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) Patents Clauses from the ANSI Essential Requirements Federal Roles in Standards, Conformity Assessment, and Accreditation Background Overview of Federal Government Activities in Conformity Assessment Administrative Procedures Act (5 U.S.C., 1976, as Amended) OMB Circular A-119 (First Take) The Department of Defense (DOD) National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) and the National Voluntary Conformity Assessment System Evaluation (NVCASE) Program Fastener Quality Act (P.L. 101-592, as Amended under P.L. 104-113, P.L. 105-234 and P.L. 106-34) National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) of 1995 (P.L. 104-113) and the OMB Circular No. A-119 (Revised February 10, 1998) (Take 2) Conformity Assessment under the NTTAA Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Management Aspects of Standards, Conformity Assessment, and Accreditation Two Cultures Economics (Benefits and Costs) of Standardization Microeconomics of Standardization Variety Reduction (Simplification) Remains an Important Principle Relationship of Standards and Conformity Assessment to Innovative and Competitive Strategies Strategic Standardization Management (SSM)(TM) Quality and Environmental Management Standards: ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 Company Use of External Standards Why a Company Should Participate in Standards Development Managing Complexity in Conformity Assessment Macroeconomics of Standards Access to Standards and Standards Developers Appendix 1: Alphabetical Index for Chapter 1 (Guide 2) Appendix 2: Alphabetical Index for Chapter 2 (ISO/IEC 17000) Appendix 3: Abbreviations and Acronyms for Standards, Conformity Assessment, and Accreditation Appendix 4: URLs for Standards, Conformity Assessment, and Accreditation Appendix 5: List of NIST Guides on Selected European Union Directives Appendix 6: Lists of International Standards Organizations Appendix 7: List of Regional Standards Organizations Appendix 8: List of National Standards Bodies References appear at the end of each chapter.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,297
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,254
Écart entre enseignants0,245 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

En bref

Citations9
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetSafety Systems Engineering in AutonomyTravaux en français237 207