The Road Safety Monitor 2006: Distracted Driving
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Road Safety Monitor (RSM) is an annual public opinion survey by the Traffic Injury Research Foundation (TIRF) that takes the pulse of the nation on key road safety issues by means of a telephone survey of a random, representative sample of Canadian drivers. The results of the RSM are released in a series of reports – the present one focuses on driver distraction. Results show that a growing number of Canadians are concerned about distracted driving – in a previous survey in 2001, about 40% of Canadians thought distracted driving was a serious problem; the current survey found that nearly 70% thought it was a serious problem. 95.5% of drivers think there is more distracted driving today than there was 5 years ago. Distractions from outside the vehicle were reported more often as a problem than distractions from within the vehicle – for example, 9.5% of the drivers surveyed said they had to brake or steer to avoid a collision caused by a distraction inside the vehicle, whereas over twice that number (20.2%) said they had to brake or steer to avoid a collision caused by a distraction outside the vehicle. Age of driver was unrelated to problems associated with distractions arising from outside the vehicle but was closely related to problems with internal distractions – e.g., 19.5% of young drivers reported they had to brake or steer to avoid a collision as a result of a distraction arising inside the vehicle, compared to only 6% of 55-64 year olds. The use of a cell phone while driving appears to be increasing – in 2001, 20.5% of drivers reported using a cell phone while driving in the past seven days; in the current survey that number had risen to 37%. However, there also appears to be a trend toward lower usage time – e.g., there has been an increase in the percentage of drivers who use their cell phone for less than 10 minutes a week (from 57.6% in 2001 to 69.4% in 2006) and a decrease in those who use it between 10 and 20 minutes (from 23.4% to 14.7%). Further monitoring is necessary before drawing definitive conclusions about these changes. Male drivers and young drivers aged 16-34 are more likely to report using their cell phone while driving. Canadians overwhelmingly support more educational and awareness efforts on the broader issue of distracted driving. More specifically, on the potential dangers associated with the use of electronic devices, there is little agreement regarding the most effective prevention measures; however, there is considerable support for a restriction on the use of cell phones by new drivers.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».