Creating options for family recovery: a providers guide for promoting parental mental health
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Creating options for family recovery: a providers guide for promoting parental mental health, by Joanne Nicholson, Toni Wolf, Chip Wilder and Kathleen Biebel, Marlborough, MA, Employment Options Inc., 2014, 120 pp., $29.95 (paperback), ISBN-10: 0692330801, ISBN-13: 978-0692330807This well-written guidebook for clinicians on the provision of mental health care to families has a very attractive cover, and is even more attractive inside. It is the result of 15 years of work by a Massachusetts, USA, team of researchers, care providers, policy-makers, parents, and family members - the Family Options Project.Dr Joanne Nicholson spearheads this project. She is a clinical and research psychologist and a professor in the Department of Psychiatry at the Dartmouth University who has long been recognized for her many contributions to the mental health community in the area of parenting.Over the course of her career, Dr Nicholson has repeatedly drawn attention to the needs of parents living with mental illness. Approximately one in four adults suffer episodic or continuous psychiatric symptoms. Approximately two-thirds of these adults are also parents. No matter how well-resourced or how cohesive the families of these parents may be, external help will be needed to ensure the healthy development of the children. Unfortunately, many of the families, in addition to psychiatric problems, also live in conditions of poverty, relative isolation, ill health, inadequate housing, and unsafe surroundings. Responsibility for such families is parceled out to child and adult health and social agencies, to welfare and housing, to police and legal authorities. Attempts are made to provide for the individuals in the family but the family as an entity is often not considered and ill parents are not provided with the help they need to adequately provide for their children. Incorporating feedback from parents caught in such circumstances, the Family Options Project has been developing, implementing, and evaluating an effective family-focused intervention (Hinden, Wolf, Biebel, & Nicholson, 2009; Nicholson, Albert, Gershenson, Williams, Biebel, 2009; Nicholson, Biebel, Williams, & Albert, 2008).In a format that stimulates learning, the book explains and illustrates the Family Recovery theoretical model, the Family Options intervention and the steps that need to be taken toward its implementation. The book also shows how parts of the program can be exported to other sites and other circumstances. The main emphasis of the program is on working together with families and learning from them, while at the same time helping them to promote positive communication and positive relationships within the family. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».