Cultures and Communion: Diversity and Communality in the Church and World
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
It is a privilege to be invited to present this Bishop Gray Memorial Lecture. In recent months I have been interested to read of the beginnings of the mission of the Anglican Church in South Africa and of Bishop Gray's arrival in Cape Town in 1848, followed by the years of his pioneering ministry. I could not help but note some parallels with early mission and ministry in my as well as many differences. Although there was a considerable population of peoples native to North America when the first European settlers came, and some notable efforts were made to bring the gospel of Jesus Christ to them, there is mostly a sad history of devastating diseases, the taking of lands and a consequent dwindling of Native American peoples. While I am grateful to report that a number of Native Americans are Christians today, there are yet considerable poverty and societal problems. This, together with the results of the myth that white settlers were moving into empty country, and the smaller numbers of Native Americans, has meant that the history of the development of North America has, for the most part, largely excluded the land's original inhabitants. The relationship of those early colonists from Europe and the succeeding generations with England was complicated. There was the often arduous and dangerous sea voyage that separated America from England, giving rise to difficulties with communications and understanding that eventually led to the War of Independence and a new country of thirteen states coming together as the United States of America. The fledging Church of England, strong particularly in the Middle Atlantic States from Connecticut through the Carolinas, found itself in difficult straits after the war. A number of the laity and more than half of the clergy had been loyal to England during the revolution. Quite a few of the clergy left for Canada when England lost the war. The weakened church was struggling for an identity. Who were they now that the political connection with the home country and its support was broken? Moreover, the church in the United States had no bishops. In the past, clergy had come from England or had gone there to be ordained before returning to minister in the new country. Were bishops even needed? And, it was asked, what kind of bishops would there be, since many Virginians and New Yorkers, among others, remembered or had been told about English bishops who were prelates linked with the upper class and indifferent to the needs of their flock. In the end, the episcopate came to the United States through the nonjuring bishops of the Episcopal Church in Scotland. Two results of this derivation were the church's name as the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America and the acceptance of the Scottish form for the celebration of the Holy Eucharist. The unique history of this early development of an offshoot of the Church of England in the United States is, however, in its way typical for each of the thirty-eight member churches of the Anglican Communion throughout the world. Each of them has a different and special story because they began in different lands at somewhat different times and among different people and circumstances. These diversities of cultures and languages profoundly affected the ways in which the Christian faith of the Church of England come to be presented, interpreted, and practiced in many areas of the world. As the eight hundred or so bishops of the Anglican Communion prepared to gather in Canterbury, England for the Lambeth Conference of 1998, the recognition of this pluralism influenced planning for one of the major discussions of the Conference, and I was asked to chair the Section entitled Called to Be a Faithful Church in a Plural World. Diversity, we realized, is not only part of our history but is also of great significance in our contemporary churches and in the many countries and cultures of the Communion. Furthermore, the many different influences are playing themselves out in a world of rapid change and development. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».