Investigating floodproofing strategies for historic settlement areas of the Fraser River Basin, British Columbia, Canada : a complementary application of multi attribute decision making and stated preference discrete choice modelling
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Floodproofing is a non-structural flood mitigation method often used as a secondary flood protection for homes located in floodplains that are already protected by dykes.In the Fraser River Basin, since 1973, floodproofing has been required for all new residential developments in the floodplain, except those located in "urban exempt zones" of hstorically settled areas.Consequently, many communities in the lower Fraser Rrver floodplain rely solely on the dyking system for flood protection.Governments would hke to encourage floodproofing in existing residential developments of hstoric settlement areas but are concerned about potential impacts, such as aesthetics and costs, and lack knowledge about public preferences regardmg potential floodproofing programs.Academically, this resource management problem presents an interesting challenge.Tradtional methods for addressing multiple objective decision problems of public concern are deficient: they either lack the abhty to adequately address multi-variate decisions requiting quantitative value trade-offs, or are &equipped to deal with public preference elicitation on a large scale.To address these h t a t i o n s , a complementary methodology was devised that combined the structured decision framework and analysis tools of multiple attribute decision analysis with the public preference survey elicitation methods of stated preference choice modehng.The results showed that t h s novel combination of tradtionally &sparate research parahgms can produce important academic insights as well as relevant management fmdmgs.The study found that floodproofing can be an acceptable approach for acheving key flood management objectives, from the perspective of both floodplain managers and the public.Once informed about the community flood management context, homeowners preferred to make trade-offs with regards to concerns, such as aesthetics and costs, to promote floodproofmg in the community, rather than maintain the status quo.In addition, homeowners would prefer to floodproof their own homes, even if floodproofmg requires significant personal investment, but at the same time they would Me to see an active and positive government role in fundmg and providing direction for such a program.I would not have been able to successfully complete such an exciung and ambitious research project without the support and assistance of many inlviduals.First of all, my senior supervisor, Dr. Wolfgang Haider, deserves a tremendous amount of c r e l t for h s constant guidance and advice, unwavering enthusiasm for my work, and superior editing abibties.Despite hls demanding schedule, Wolfgang always made time to help me.I would also like to thank Dr. IGistina Rothley for fachtating my understandmg of the larger context and for helping me to articulate and define the research rational.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».