Morton, Karen. A Life Marketed as Fiction: An Analysis of the Works of Eliza Parsons
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Morton, Karen. A Life Marketed as Fiction: An Analysis of Works of Eliza Parsons. Kansas City: Valancourt Books, 2011. 291 pp. Hardcover. ISBN 978-1-934555-22-4. $65.00. With A Life Marketed as Fiction, Karen Morton published a significant and valuable work on Eliza Parsons, a late eighteenth-century British novelist who remained something of an obscure literary footnote since 1817 publication of Jane Austen's parody, Northanger Abbey. Morton's text is first book-length study of Parsons, whose two novels, The Castle of Wolfenbach (1793) and The Mysterious Warning (1796), are mentioned in Northanger Abbey by Isabella Thorpe to Catherine Morland in a list of horrid novels that they plan to read together. In this study, Morton argues for a reassessment of Parsons by correcting errors in previous scholarship, most notably those of Canadian critic Devendra Varma in The Flame and elsewere, and by bringing attention to women's writing in late eighteenth century through this once popular, but now almost forgotten, literary figure. The result is a comprehensive examination of Eliza Parsons's life and work that deepens our understanding of Gothic's early development as well as experience of being a female novelist during final years of eighteenth century. Morton divides her book into nine chapters, with supplemental sections that include a chronology of Parsons's biography; a list of subscribers to her first novel, The History of Miss Meredith (1790); and contemporary reviews of her novels and only play. In introductory chapter, Morton explains that her work demonstrates possibilities for new research about relatively unknown writers from late eighteenth century. Morton claims that her work is a combination of traditional literary analysis and an examination of textual elements, such as dedications, prefaces, and private requests for financial aid, that tend to be overlooked by scholars. Additionally, she notes that this text has involved consultation of numerous archives, libraries, journals, and web-sites and resulted in uncovering of new facts about her life, work, and reception from contemporary documents to trace information back to its original sources (11) to widen available knowledge of Parsons as well as to correct errors in previous scholarship that have stood unchallenged for decades. Morton is incisive with her understanding of Parsons in this chapter, explaining that [Parsons] experiments in genre: in literature and in life. She tries on new roles, depending on her current specific purpose; for example, to request money or to present herself as a playwright, but behind every new attempt lives specific, unwavering goal of earning enough to feed, clothe, house, and educate her large family (35). This construction and utilization of various personae, evident in her writing, allows Parsons to challenge boundaries, which Morton remarks is a characteristic that many women of period display and links to the subversiveness of Gothic (35). This first chapter also contains brief explanations of other literary roles that Parsons tried, and then abandoned, such as editor and translator. In second chapter, Morton discusses Parsons's biography, which, as she dutifully notes, been, up until now, rather sketchy and much of what been published about her is based on incorrect findings (45). Although surprisingly brief at only fifteen pages, this chapter is significant as it is now most detailed biographical narrative of Eliza Parsons's life. The endnotes for this chapter reveal a great deal of original research from numerous sources, nearly all of which have never been referred to in previous scholarship on Parsons; for example, Morton's research made available important details about Parsons's life, such as her friendship with English poet and novelist Mary Robinson, and fact that she gave advice on writing a novel to Frances Maria Sewell Lewis, mother of Matthew Lewis. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,009 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,021 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».