MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1160745365

Lord Mansfield: Justice in the Age of Reason

2015· article· en· W1160745365 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jonathan Cohen

Notice bibliographique

RevueBusiness law international · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueMulticultural Socio-Legal Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoliticsLawEconomic JusticeBiographyQueen (butterfly)ScotsThroneHistoryReligious studiesClassicsArtSociologyPolitical sciencePhilosophyLiterature
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Lord Mansfield: Justice in the Age of Reason Norman 5 Poser McGill-Queen's University Press (2013); 432 pages (hardback); £27.99; ISBN-10: 0773541837; ISBN-13: 978-0773541832Professor Norman Poser's biography of England's greatest judge and longest-serving politician to have hailed from Scotland cannot be recommended highly enough.The first section of the book covers Lord Mansfield's early life as a pupil at Westminster School and an undergraduate at Christ Church, Oxford. He studied hard and learned to network compulsively to overcome the prejudice he experienced as a Scot with aristocratic lineage but without wealth. Poser describes Lord Mansfield's career rise from his days at the bar living off food parcels from relatives to his appointment as Solicitor General, Attorney-General and Chief Justice of the Court of King's Bench. Critically, the author then sets that rise against the backdrop of the constitutional and political currents of the early 18th century, which were to have an impact on Lord Mansfield's judicial and political philosophy.Poser identifies that prime among those influences, which he references adeptly throughout his book, was Jacobitism. That was the campaign to restore to the throne of Great Britain the descendants of the Catholic James II (Latin, Jacobus) who was ousted by the Glorious Revolution of 1688 and replaced by the Protestant William of Orange and Queen Mary. It attracted a great deal of support, especially among the Tory opponents to the various Whig administrations of the time. Although not Catholics, many Scots Protestants supported it, hoping that the restoration of the Stuart line would mean the end of the Act of Union between England and Scotland.To his later chagrin, Lord Mansfield's family could hardly have been more supportive of James's son, James Edward Stuart (the Pretender), and of his grandson Charles Edward Stuart (Bonnie Prince Charlie). Lord Mansfield's father stopped just short of joining the 1715 rebellion; his brother joined the rebellion and then became an adviser to the Pretender in Paris and his mother billeted Bonnie Prince Charlie in Perth during the 1745 Jacobite rebellion. Mansfield had, in 1725, sent a letter of support to the Pretender and spent the rest of his life hoping that it would never come to light, all the more so when he advised various ministries and became effectively the consigliere to George III.To counter that concern, Mansfield led the 1747 prosecution of Lord Lovat, one of the supporters of Bonnie Prince Charlie, at his trial for treason before the House of Lords. He also advised the government to prosecute the ringleaders of the rebellion, including Flora McDonald, who was instrumental in Bonnie Prince Charlie's flight when the rebellion failed. On Poser's fullyjustified theory, that sense of concern was also the reason why Lord Mansfield ruled in favour of virtually any government attempt to preserve its privileges and power in the law courts and supported that line in debates in Parliament, especially in the face of the American Revolution.Other early influences that Poser covers include the massive 18th century increase in trade for Great Britain, which inspired Lord Mansfield to uphold commercial interests as much as he could as a judge. He maintained the common law rule that any attempt by workers to combine in order to force improvements in their conditions on employers was conspiracy. In another case the question before the Court of Kang's Bench was whether the stench of a laboratory in London, which burnt bones to extract ammonia for sulphuric acid, was a nuisance to the neighbours. Lord Mansfield instructed the jury that the processes in the factory did not constitute a nuisance. He explained that the production of home-grown sulphuric acid would obviate the need to import it and overrode the inconvenience. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,035
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,070

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0070,009
Communication savante0,0070,008
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0050,007
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0160,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,082
Tête enseignante GPT0,359
Écart entre enseignants0,277 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBusiness law internationalMême sujetMulticultural Socio-Legal StudiesTravaux en français237 207