The Fictional World of Garshin and Borchert: "The Red Flower" and "The Dandelion"
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Vsevolod Garshin's Red Flower (Krasnyi tsvetok 1883) and Wolfgang Borchert's Dandelion (Die Hundeblume 1947) are famous stories with remarkably similar structures, yet as far as I know they have received a comparative treatment. In Garshin's story an asylum patient believes some red poppies are the keepers of the world's evil and he decides to break from his watchful guardians and pluck the poppies to save the world. In Borchert's story a prisoner, repressed from performing any act of self-expression, reaches outside his tightly guarded daily routine to pluck a dandelion and, thus, redeem his sense of individuality and life. On first glance, the stories share obvious traits: the titles are common flora and represent the goal of the protagonists' quests; the stories are set in an institution where anonymity of patient and prisoner is the norm; the protagonists have chosen to be there; the stories focus on an existence of solitude; and, in both stories the minds of the protagonists uniquely empower seemingly insignificant flowers, an empowerment which reveals awareness and action that distinguish the characters' individual domains. Perhaps most apparently, both characters come to act in a manner best defined as unreasonable. Certainly, Anthony Storr's generalization, when solitary confinement is accompanied by threats, uncertainty, lack of sleep and other measures, the victim may surfer disruption of normal mental function without being able to muster any compensatory reintegration (Storr 42), could explain this bent for unreason. Yet, these two character portraits are subject to different, and individual, conditions. The aims of this paper are to clarify these conditions, underscore the different ways in which Garshin and Borchert employ similar structures, devices, and motifs, and account for the unreason that might explain the protagonists' exceptional desire. One-person worlds The of Garshin's and Borchert's stories is best described as a fictional (Dolezel 1998, 37). Other characters are present in the fictional world, but they are not admitted into its activities (Dolezel 1998, 48). The designation one-person world does ignore the fact that the protagonist's communication and interaction in each of these stories are fundamental to these fictional worlds. In any narrative text, Claude Bremond reminds us, there is some form of communication or experience that involves a protagonist (Bremond 390). However, the discursive nature of the that results from the text does need to depend on the presence of more than one character. Protagonists can wrestle with societal forms and ideals or reckon with nature. In such instances a protagonist is in communication with a participant or quasi-participant, and this communication affects the order of the narrative. It follows, then, that in Garshin's and Borchert's stories the process whereby the participant--the red flower or the dandelion--becomes the protagonist's focus reveals a trait of the fictional and presupposes order in the narrative. In addition, the cause of the flower's significance and the manner of interaction between the protagonist and the flower reflect the protagonist's individual nature. Such meditated, spontaneous, and accomplished actions of a character, Thomas Pavel has shown, define the narrative domain of that character (Pavel 1980, 105; 1986, 103). The reason underlying such character definition accords with the personal system of rules that instructs the character in his activities, and each domain has its own rules of perception and ontological structure (Pavel 1980, 107). In Garshin's and Borchert's worlds two levels of communication and experience exist: the level dominated by the domain of the hero, and the level dominated by the actions of the asylum and prison staff. The micro of the protagonist is a distinct element of the macro of the institution. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle