MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W116819184

Space and Place: Walking through Kamloops

2010· article· en· W116819184 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bruce Baugh

Notice bibliographique

RevueMosaic (Winnipeg) · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGeographies of human-animal interactions
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSpace (punctuation)NoticeFront (military)Movement (music)Dimension (graph theory)PaceDowntownSociologyAestheticsGeographyComputer sciencePhilosophyLawPolitical scienceArchaeologyGeodesy
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Using philosophy and social theory, this essay examines walking as a privileged means of revealing physical and social environment of a small city. My regular walk from downtown Kamloops, British Columbia, to Thompson Rivers University frames exploration of social, historical, and bodily construction of and place. We all have some idea of what it means to have a of place: it is idea of what and who belongs to a certain place, of some noteworthy features of place, or location of that place relative to its surroundings or relative to other places. In same way, we have a rough idea of what is, if only because we live and move in space, and our very bodies are spatial, having not only size and dimension, but also orientation (left, right, up, down, forward, back). In this essay, I explore my experiences of walking through a particular small city--Kamloops, in British Columbia, Canada--to illuminate how space and place are revealed through walking. Walking unfolds and reveals space at a different pace and with a different rhythm from driving in a car, riding in a bus or flying over in a plane. There are no barriers between walker and surrounding world, no elaborate technique to be mindful of as walker one in front of another. The body and senses of walker enter into intimate proximity with environment not achievable through other modes of transport. The walker is more apt to notice details that escape glance of driver hurtling by or bus-rider engrossed in her book, more able to actually feel contours and textures of landscape, more exposed to scents and smells of automobile fumes and vegetation, more attuned to play of light and shadow, heat and cold, which are as much felt on skin as seen by eyes. A walker does not skip over much, sees things close up, and makes herself vulnerable and accessible to local people and places (Solnit 128). Walking is then perhaps a privileged mode of encountering space and place, as walker is a part of very fabric of space being traversed, exposed to natural and social forces it contains and revealing those forces through body's reactions to them: there is a sense of place that can only be gained on foot (Solnit 9). Walking is act that reveals different aspects of object in much way that, Merleau-Ponty says, body's senses and capacities for movement and action reveal different aspects of material we inhabit (98-153, 243-98). It is active engagement of body in world, not merely passive spectatorship but rather, as Rebecca Solnit argues, making and working, a way of knowing through body and body through world (29). Walking can become an investigation, a ritual, a meditation (Solnit 3), mode of investigation par excellence of what Guy Debord calls psychogeography, the study of precise laws and specific effects of geographical environment, consciously organized or not, on emotions and behaviour of individuals, because of way walking reveals ambience of a street or neighbourhood (5). What is space? On face of it, it is simply of width, height, depth: traditional three dimensions we use in measuring a room or a piece of furniture. In this conception, space is quantitative: it is measurable, whether in inches and miles, or in centimetres and light years. What makes space measurable is that it is single, uniform, and homogeneous. Every region of space is continuous with other regions (there are no gaps in space), every space, as space, is just like any other space (all space is empty, and lacks any differentiating qualities), and every region of space can be measured in same way, whether we are talking about a living room or a galaxy. Such space is symmetrical and reversible: distance between two points is same in both directions. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,699
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,307
Écart entre enseignants0,289 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMosaic (Winnipeg)Même sujetGeographies of human-animal interactionsTravaux en français237 207