Showcasing the Great Experiment: Cultural Diplomacy and Western Visitors to the Soviet Union, 1921-1941
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Michael David-Fox. Showcasing the Great Experiment: Cultural Diplomacy and Western Visitors to the Soviet Union, 1921-1941. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2012. xii, 396 pp. Notes. Index. US $55.00 / Cdn $60.50, cloth.Cultural diplomacy between the Soviet Union and the West was filled with paradoxes in the interwar period. Western visitors considered the country a representation both of the world's future and of its past. Soviet leaders were wary of foreign guests but wanted, even needed, to impress them. This contradictory relationship, argues Michael David-Fox, spawned an unprecedented system for receiving foreign visitors and influencing the image of the Soviet Union abroad (p. 16). Examining this system, the ambitious Showcasing the Great Experiment frames Soviet cultural diplomacy through expressions of superiority and inferiority (p. 24). To do so, David-Fox intertwines the history of the main institutions responsible for cultural diplomacy with illustrative and compelling case studies of visitors.Soviet cultural diplomacy was a child of necessity. After the revolution the country was diplomatically isolated, but it was also desperately in need of material aid. Soviet leaders employed the main tool they had, cultural diplomacy, to garner support with sympathizers abroad, mostly left-leaning intellectuals. The main bureaucratic player in this system was the Ail-Union Society for Cultural Ties Abroad (VOKS). On VOKS-organized tours, guides acted as interpreters not only of language but of Soviet culture, attempting to monitor and control the impressions of guests. Working abroad, VOKS friendship societies had varying degrees of success in the countries of Europe and North America in creating support, particularly through scientific exchanges.The burdens placed on VOKS created a crisis of authenticity-a central theme in the work as a whole. It appears most strongly as the Potemkin village dilemma. VOKS officials ultimately wanted guests to take home positive impressions of the Soviet Union's progress. The tension was that guided tours of model farms might seem inauthentic, while less controlled tours would seem more authentic but might reflect poorly on the USSR. The imperative for authenticity won the day in the 1927 VOKS-led trip of author Theodore Dreiser, but in the 1930s visits became far more staged. The book also challenges notions of the (in)authentic nature of intellectuals' visits and impressions of the Soviet Union. Tours of prominent fellow travellers provide case studies that revisit the question of these foreigners' complicity in the regime. Were they simply dupes or guilty of whitewashing the crimes of Stalinism? …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».