MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W118469069

Push for a 'Global Commons' Theory

2013· article· en· W118469069 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kishore Kumar

Notice bibliographique

RevueINDIAN FOREIGN AFFAIRS JOURNAL · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnergy
ThématiqueGlobal Energy and Sustainability Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFrontierRealmUnited Nations Convention on the Law of the SeaPolitical scienceOceanographyEnvironmental ethicsGeographyHistoryLawGeologyInternational lawPhilosophy
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

IntroductionScientific developments and, consequently, economic growth have resulted from humankind pushing the frontiers of knowledge. Be it in the realm of marine / deep Sea, nuclear energy, microbiology and biotechnology, space or polar science, it was the spirit of adventure and quest for knowledge that broke new ground. Sometimes, one incident leads to another and a major discovery is made. For example, in the early 1960s, a Soviet nuclear submarine sank off the North American coast in the deep sea of the ClarionClipperton transform. This was recovered by the USA secretly under seabed survey, using Hughe's Glomar Explorer which had a 82-metre-long bay that could be opened and closed in its hull. This exercise led to the finding of high-grade polymetallic nodules, containing strategic metals like copper, cobalt, nickel and manganese. In the meeting of the UN General Assembly (1967), Arvid Pardo of Malta focused international attention on the vast potential of resources on the seabed. The events following this discovery form a watershed in history when laws of the sea were evolved to highlight the common heritage of mankind. However, this journey has been a difficult one from the point of view of India and the developing world. International negotiations for access to such new opportunities have witnessed, as we shall argue later, efforts to block outsiders from entering the domains of frontier knowledge and technologies.In the realm of the Arctic, this is an occasion to remember the contribution of the Norwegian explorer Roald Amundsen. He was the first to traverse the North-West Passage (1903-1906), the North-East Passage (1918-1920), now called the Northern Route, as also to lead the first expedition to reach the North Pole (1926). He learnt from the Netsilk people Arctic survival skills, use of sled dogs, and to wear animal skins in lieu of heavy woollen parkas. He also faced a number of accidents - broke his arms and also was attacked by polar bears. He disappeared in June 1928 when he embarked on a search mission for survivors of an air crash in the vast snow. He and other explorers collected valuable scientific data, some of which were also lost in the ill-fated journey. However, the expeditions of Amundsen and his colleagues opened the possibilities in the Arctic region, culminating in the current conundrum on territorial and resource claims in the region, as well as the northern passage between the Atlantic and the Pacific.The RegionThe Arctic is a white desert, the largest and least fragmented of the inhabited regions in the world. It contains vast areas of fjords (narrow strip of sea between high cliffs), tundra (large frozen land with no vegetation), as well as jagged peaks, frozen seas, glaciers, and icebergs. The glacier fingers extend down the mountain ridges in Norway, the Urals, Kolyma, Alaska, Yukon and Bafin islands, reaching below the Arctic/Polar Circle. The 1500 km of polar ice extends south to three exits: the narrow exit west of Greenland into North Atlantic; through the 500-km-wide strait between Greenland and Svalbard; and through the 70-km Bering Strait between Chukotka and Alaska into the Bering Sea onward to the Pacific Ocean. We shall discuss later that the melting of ice in the Arctic Sea provides the all-important North-West and North-East passages for ships and super-tankers, yielding huge advantages in terms of shipping time and fuel consumed.Unlike the Antarctic continent, the Arctic has human settlements with adequate resource use in terms of fish/mammals and firewood. The indigenous population, the Inuits, have the ability to predict and make use of patterns of species and their habitats - salmon runs, caribou migration, grazing areas, etc. - which are essential to develop villages, as also Reindeer husbandry. The introduction of new technologies over the years - snow machines replacing dog teams and reindeer, rifles/shotguns for bows and arrows, and outboard motors for paddle and wind-driven boats - while increasing their hunting efficiency, has also put a strain on resources. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,822
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,262
Écart entre enseignants0,250 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueINDIAN FOREIGN AFFAIRS JOURNALMême sujetGlobal Energy and Sustainability ResearchTravaux en français237 207