MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1188124929

Preparing for the Future of Education-Equipping Students with 21st Century Skills: An Interview with Dr. Robin Fogarty

2013· article· en· W1188124929 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Margaret Trybus

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œDelta Kappa Gamma bulletin · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueEducational Challenges and Innovations
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCurriculumPublishingSociologyTheme (computing)LiteracyLibrary sciencePsychologyPedagogyMedical educationPolitical scienceMedicineLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This interview continues a series initiated by members of the Bulletin's Editorial Board. The ooal of the series is to feature interviews conducted with Delta Kappa Gamma members or other educational leaders on a topic related to the theme of the issue. Here, Dr. Trybus presents the results of an interview with education writer and leader Dr. Robin Fogarty regarding the future of education.An Introduction to Dr* FogartyRobin Fogarty, PhD, is president of Robin Fogarty and Associates, Ltd., a Chicagobased, minority-owned educational publishing and consulting company Her doctorate is in curriculum and human resource development from Loyola University of Chicago. A leading proponent of the thoughtful classroom, Fogarty has trained educators throughout the world in curriculum, instruction, and assessment strategies. She has taught at all levels from kindergarten to college, served as an administrator, and consulted with state departments and ministries of education in the United States, Puerto Rico, Russia, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Germany, Great Britain, Singapore, Korea, and the Netherlands. Fogarty has published articles in Educational Leadership, Phi Delta Kappan, and Journal of Staff Development. She is the author of numerous publications, including Brain-Compatible Classrooms, Ten Things New Teachers Need, Literacy Matters, How to Integrate the Curricula, The Adult Learner, A Look at Transfer, Close the Achievement Gap, Twelve Brain Principles, Nine Best Practices, Informative Assessment, and Supporting Differentiated Instruction: A PLC Approach. Her recent work includes a two-book leadership series, From Staff Room to Classroom-Book I and II, as well as a chapter on The Singapore Vision, in 21st Century Skills: Re-Thinking How Students Learn. Fogarty's latest co-authored efforts are How To Teach Thinking Skills Within The Common Core: 7 Student Proficiencies of the New National Standards; and School Leaders Guide to the Common Core: Achieving Results With Rigor And Relevance.Her motto is teachers make the difference in the learning journey of every child.Introduction to the InterviewThe future of education may seem daunting and challenging if educators lack a vision of what matters most for students to be prepared for the 21st century. A clear sense of purpose and direction for that vision must start with acknowledging the challenges in the change process. What educators know and practice in teaching now will not be adequate for the future with the changing roles of curriculum, instruction, and assessment. As part of a global society of educators, DKG members need to acknowledge the impact of technology, constructivism, school safety, and the needs of emergent learners.Foreseeing the future starts with determining how societal needs will be addressed through educating students. A look at what is in existence in schools now will lead to discussing, analyzing, and planning to manage the complex process of change for the future. This process is a necessity because the future is now, and reconceptualizing teaching and learning has already begun.Dr. Robin Fogarty has given this topic considerable thought. Her life's work in curriculum, instruction, and assessment strategies has been refined through teaching, administration, professional development, research, writing, and consulting in schools world-wide. Her perspective offers a compelling and thoughtful approach that suggests ways educators can be motivated and thoughtful to be innovative and entrepreneurial in preparing for the future.What do you see as challenges/or educational systems and how can educators better address these challenges as they prepare for the future?We have to frame the challenges around the needs of students, not just the stuff, and help students become literate, educated, and fulfilled regardless of college, career, or technology-bound futures. This will require systems to shift the focus to students and help students to become self-reliant, self-sufficient, and self-fulfilled. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,011
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,095
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,189

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0110,021
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0300,009
Communication savante0,0080,006
Science ouverte0,0020,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0080,019
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,277
Écart entre enseignants0,261 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œDelta Kappa Gamma bulletinMême sujetEducational Challenges and InnovationsTravaux en français237 207