MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1188131608

Thinking Christ: Christology and Contemporary Critics/Jesus Christ for Contemporary Life: His Person, Work, and Relationships

2013· article· en· W1188131608 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Craig Hovey

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnglican Theological Review · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésChristologyPhilosophyTheologyPower (physics)PneumatologyCriticismChristianityChristian theologySociologyLiteratureArt
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Thinking Christ: Christology and Contemporary Critics. By Jane Barter Moulaison. Minneapolis, Minn.: Fortress Press, 2012.183 pp. $25.00 (paper).andJesus Christ for Contemporary Life: His Person, Work, and Relationships. By Don Schweitzer. Eugene, Ore.: Cascade BooksAVipf and Stock, 2012. 307 pp. $35.00 (paper).Two recent books, both by Canadian theologians, not only advance contemporary Christologies by showing how a doctrine of Jesus Christ responds to current challenges and critiques, they also exemplify two different approaches to Christianity's traditional theologies in light of these challenges.Thinking Christ by Jane Barter Moulaison of the University of Winnipeg is an elegantly written book that faces a number of urgent contemporary moral and political questions with a Nicene theology of Jesus Christ. Doing so, she advocates a so-called postcritical theology, one that neither simply adopts the thinking produced by Christian tradition throughout the centuries, nor condemningly looks on from the outside. Yet, she insists, Postcritical is not uncritical; but the criticism arises from within the desires and principles of the communities themselves rather than from an extrinsic source (p. 143). The voices from the tradition on whom she most relies are Irenaeus, Athanasius, Basil, and Augustine. Self-consciously thinking and writing with the spirit rather than the letter of these theologians, Barter Moulaison artfully takes up contemporary questions like power, gender, and economy through ancient resources, thus uniting Christians of today with their forebears. To the objection that many of these ancient voices were narrowly committed to particulars that render them unusable-that is, they were male and, as Constantinian, inappropriately aligned with political power and empire- Barter Moulaison commends both greater care regarding the historical claims (noting, for example, that Athanasius's relationship to the empire was rather complicated) and greater receptivity toward everyone regardless of their worldview, parochial commitments, and privilege.Two topics stand out for being developed in especially profitable ways. First is Barter Moulaison s treatment of violence by considering widespread contemporary dissatisfaction with penal substitution theories of the atonement, sometimes dismissed as divine child abuse. She partly faults the standard, textbook approach to teaching theories of the atonement-adapted from the work of Gustav Aulen-for excluding the earliest and perhaps best description of atonement as recapitulation. Jesus Christ recapitulates the human story of Adam's disobedience, restoring humanity through his own obedience as the second Adam that Paul describes in Romans 5. Sacrifice is not perfected but exceeded and therefore abandoned in the work of Christ. Nicene (and earlier) theology supplies a much more satisfying response to penal substitution than the other presently available alternatives.Second, Barter Moulaison's treatment of religious pluralism is wonderfully clear and rewarding. She identifies a striking commonality in ways that religious pluralists (such as John Hick) and liberal progressives (citing the performance work of Eve Ensler) simplify and essentialize the particulars of specific religious traditions, especially Islam. The common thread is a tendency to view religion as private and therefore subservient to regulation by the state. Barter Moulaison argues that secularism disguises its own theology about the nature of humanity and human dignity, against which she holds up the work of Athanasius-To be human is to be Christ-like is Barter Moulaison's mellifluous phrase (p. 100). She at once affirms that Christian distinctives are not trivial just as they resist reduction to theory, while also showing that Christianity can approach interreligious dialogue because of (rather than in spite of) the particular claims it speaks about all of humanity.Don Schweitzer, of St. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,957
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,003
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,125
Tête enseignante GPT0,328
Écart entre enseignants0,203 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAnglican Theological ReviewMême sujetAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsTravaux en français237 207