Book Review: Eating Disorders: Evidence Based Treatment for Eating Disorders: Children, Adolescents and Adults
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Eating Disorders Evidence Based Treatment for Eating Disorders: Children, Adolescents and Adults Ida F Dancyger, Victor M Fornati, editors. New York (NY): Nova Science Publishers, Ine; 2009. 368 p. US$79.00 Reviewer rating: Very Good an increasing number of clinicians depend on evidence-based medicine to guarantee that the care they deliver to their patients is of the highest possible quality and is scientifically based, there remain other clinicians who are not in favour of replacing their professional creativity with some form of manual-based or pre-programmed practice. This book has achieved the status of an authoritative reference that has successfully merged evidence- and experience-based approaches to the treatment of eating disorders, including anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorders, and obesity. This book addresses 4 major themes: the biopsychosocial basis of eating disorders, the available different treatment modalities and the issue of treatment resistance, evidenceand informed-based approaches to the psychotherapy of eating disorders, and the pharmacological treatment of eating disorders. These themes are addressed in 19 chapters, with each chapter written by one or more international experts, known for their research and experience in their respective fields. Each chapter ends with a clinical vignette that demonstrates, in a clinical situation, the issues discussed in the chapter. The book chapters are generally well written, although, in some chapters, the authors tended to refer to the literature by citing the names of all the authors and coauthors instead of using the formula, the first author et al. As some articles referred to are written by several authors, the reader will be inconvenienced by going through 4 to 5 lines of names on every other page. It was very appropriate and timely to include a chapter on Evidence-Guided Treatment for Males with Eating Disorders. However, I felt the chapter was not as informative as I would have liked it to be. At the beginning of the chapter, the authors stated that have indicated that males are similar to females in terms of weight control methods, however, other studies revealed more laxative use in male as compared to female eating disorder patients. p 157 Then at the conclusion of the chapter, the same authors stated that, Although males seem to use laxatives with less frequency, have less preoccupation with thinness, and are less motivated for therapy . …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,007 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,051 | 0,028 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».