MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W122829515 · doi:10.14264/151759

Genetic mapping and pharmacological analysis of phosphine toxicity and resistance pathways in Caenorhabditis elegans

2008· dissertation· en· W122829515 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nicholas Valmas

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe University of Queensland · 2008
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPhosphineFumigationCaenorhabditis elegansToxicologyBiologyChemistryGeneticsBiochemistryEcology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The fumigant phosphine is critically important for the protection of stored commodities frominsect and rodent pests. Phasing out the use of ozone-depleting substances in accordance with theUnited Nations Montreal Protocol has left phosphine as the only economically viable fumigant forroutine use. The heavy reliance on phosphine for many years has resulted in highly-resistant pestinsects, a situation that threatens the safe and economical, long-term use of phosphine. Thenematode Caenorhabditis elegans has been used as a model organism for the study of phosphinetoxicity. The creation of phosphine-resistant C. elegans mutants (pre) has additionally allowed thisorganism to be used to model phosphine resistance.Phosphine gas is highly toxic to aerobic organisms, making it a highly effective fumigant, butalso a severe occupational health and safety risk. To address the safety concerns of working withphosphine in a university research environment, a custom-designed chamber was created for thesafe containment of the phosphine gas generated from aluminium phosphide tablets. In animprovement on previous generation systems, this chamber can be completely sealed to controlthe escape of phosphine, even if there is a complete failure of the laboratory ventilation system.The development of this novel chamber, has allowed fumigation facilities to be established atthe University of Queensland. This has allowed the phosphine resistance phenotype of the pre-7mutant of C. elegans to be characterised and has facilitated the identification of multiplephosphine synergists. The LC50 value for 24-hour phosphine exposure at 20°C is 732ppm for thewild-type N2 strain. Under the same conditions, the resistant mutant pre-7 has an LC50 value of4269ppm - a resistance factor of 5.8× greater than wild-type.Based on the proposed mode of action of phosphine as a mitochondrial toxin and initiator ofoxidative stress, a range of compounds were tested for their ability to synergistically enhance thetoxicity of phosphine. This resulted in mitochondrial uncouplers being identified as extremelypotent synergists with phosphine, capable of causing 100% mortality when used in combination.This was despite the fact that the concentrations of phosphine and uncouplers used wereindividually nonlethal. In addition to being highly potent synergists in the wild-type strain,mitochondrial uncouplers have also been shown to be effective against genetic phosphineresistance in two different pre mutant strains. In the case of pre-7, exposure to uncouplerappeared to completely negate the genetic resistance to phosphine toxicity.The reported capacity of phosphine to induce oxidative stress suggested an alternative class ofpotential phosphine synergists. As such, diethyl maleate, a compound that depletes the cellularantioxidant glutathione, was tested for a synergistic interaction with phosphine. While it waspossible to cause mortality in C. elegans with individually sub-lethal concentrations of phosphineand the glutathione depletor diethyl maleate, the synergism was not as strong as that previouslyseen with mitochondrial uncouplers. In contrast to the 100% mortality resulting from combinedtreatments of nonlethal phosphine and uncoupler concentrations; the corresponding treatmentusing dimethyl disulphide caused mortality to a level of around 30%.A potential alternative fumigant to phosphine, dimethyl disulphide (DMDS), was alsoinvestigated to determine its comparative toxicity to phosphine. Both DMDS and phosphine inhibitthe mitochondrial respiratory enzyme, cytochrome c oxidase, though the subsequent toxicitypathways of the two compounds are thought to be quite different. Under identical treatmentconditions DMDS was found to be almost 600 times more toxic to C. elegans than phosphine atthe LC50 level. No significant cross-resistance to DMDS was displayed by the phosphine-resistantmutant pre-7, as a concentration of 3ppm of DMDS for 24 hours at 20°C caused equal mortality inwild-type and pre-7.Using both classical and molecular techniques, a genetic study was also carried out on the pre-7mutant. The factor responsible for the phosphine resistance of pre-7 was determined to be due toa completely recessive autosomal genetic element. This factor was mapped to a 96 kb region ofthe C. elegans chromosome II. Subsequent gene knockdown and gene expression analysis of thisregion identified two plausible candidates from the 17 predicted genes at this locus, but the generesponsible for the resistance phenotype was not unambiguously identified.As a result of this work, the nematode C. elegans has been established as the premiere modelorganism with which to study phosphine toxicity and resistance. Synergist discovery has become astraightforward procedure that may result in new grain protection strategies to alleviate theeconomic and food security problems resulting from phosphine resistance. The work presented inthis thesis presents C. elegans as an excellent model for testing of prevailing theories regarding themode of phosphine toxicity. Furthermore, the genetic characterisation of the phosphine-resistantpre-7 mutant is the most advanced genetic analysis of phosphine resistance ever conducted

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,804
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,557

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,202
Écart entre enseignants0,192 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe University of QueenslandMême sujetGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsTravaux en français237 207