Land Reform in Russia: Institutional Design and Behavioural Responses
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Stephen K. Wegren. Land Reform in Russia: Institutional Design and Behavioural Responses. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009. xix, 340 pp. Glossary. Appendices. Index. $55.00, paper.Stephen K. Wegren' s monograph provides a detailed analysis of the politics of land reform in post-communist Russia. The book will be of interest to specialists in Russian reform, to students of comparative agricultural policy and peasant studies, and to those interested in legislative processes in post-communist countries. Land Reform in Russia is clearly the fruit of countless years of careful research. The reader quickly forms the impression of an author who has seen more than a few seasons change in the Russian countryside. Surely there can be few greater challenges for a social scientist than studying land reform in a country with the largest amount of territory of any state in the world. One should acknowledge, with appreciation, that it is very labour-intensive to produce a monograph with this level of empirical detail.The monograph shows several particular strengths. Wegren provides an exhaustive account of the legislative evolution of Russian land reform, which at least until Putin's presidency proceeded in fits and starts until the final Land Code was adopted in 2002. Second, Wegren includes a detailed discussion of the legal regulation of land in Russia, painting a vivid picture of multiple layers of conditions imposed on the use of land. For the average rural resident, the end result could be described as a rather precarious set of rights. One must be careful when using the term privatization to describe Russia's land reform, because as Wegren points out, an individual's access to land may comprise some combination of family plots, shares of former collective farm land, rental arrangements, and rights of use. Privatization, therefore, is only one part of the land reform story.Third, the greatest strength of Wegren' s work is his discussion of survey research results and statistical data. In the second half of the book, the author documents the impact that reforms have had on Russian rural dwellers. The reader learns from Wegren that some citizens (predominantly male, well-educated, and well-connected) feel they have benefited from the process of change, but that many more peasants have experienced a sense of loss. Nevertheless, the odds of success are not completely stacked in favour of those who are already privileged. For instance, Wegren' s data suggests that bigger families working the land they occupy tend to accumulate more land than smaller families, because of the ability to concentrate the work of a larger number of people (pp. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».