MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W125593926 · doi:10.1093/pch/19.3.123a

Case 1: An infant with a low heart rate

2014· article· en· W125593926 sur OpenAlexaff
Dustin Jacobson, Dragoş Predescu, Tapas Mondal

Notice bibliographique

RevuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Établissements canadiensMcMaster Children's HospitalMcMaster University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineHeart rateCardiologyPediatricsInternal medicineBlood pressure

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A newborn boy born at 37 weeks' gestation was referred to the paediatric cardiology service while in the neonatal intensive care unit because of bradycardia. Maternal history was significant for hypothyroidism treated with levothyroxine, chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura identified during pregnancy and treated with prednisone, and cholestasis during pregnancy. Bradycardia was initially detected prenatally; however, regular ultrasounds, fetal echocardiogram and biophysical profiles were normal. Maternal testing was negative for antinuclear antibody, anti-Rho and anti-La antibodies. On delivery, the infant's heart rate was 100 beats/min and he was transferred to a level 2 nursery. On further history, it was noted that the parents were consanguineous (the parents were first cousins, and the maternal grandmother was the sister of the paternal grandfather), and there was a family history of thrombocytopenia in the father, paternal uncle and paternal grandfather. There was no reported history of arrhythmias, sudden death, unexplained car accidents or drownings in the family. The patient's four-year-old sister was healthy. On examination, the infant did not exhibit any dysmorphic features. Cardiovascular examination was normal, and there were no signs of heart failure. Further investigations established the diagnosis. Initial investigations after birth were significant for multiple electrocardiograms (ECG) revealing a prolonged QT interval (approximately 600 ms to 650 ms) (Figure 1). With this finding, in addition to a Holter monitor, ECGs of the parents and sister, as well as a genetics consultation were requested. The differential diagnosis included primary myopathies due to metabolic abnormalities, or channelopathies due to autosomal dominant prolonged QT syndromes and autosomal recessive prolonged QT syndromes. Electrocardiogram of the patient on day 1 of life, showing a prolonged QT interval Echocardiography revealed a structurally normal heart. Holter monitor recordings demonstrated poor variability, T alternans, a low heart rate with an average of 96 beats/min and a prolonged QT interval. Very low heart rates are an important sign of long QT syndromes (1). Newborn screening was negative for metabolic disorders. A genetics consultation suggested a genetic long QT syndrome as the most likely diagnosis. The parents' ECGs were normal, and the sister's ECG demonstrated a slightly increased corrected QT interval at higher heart rates. The electrophysiology service was consulted soon after birth and decided on treatment with propranolol (2 mg/kg/day). Beta-blockers have been found to be of some benefit in Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome (JLNS) (2); however, a significant risk for sudden death remains. Use of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator was considered, but anatomical considerations in a small infant and the risk of inappropriate shocks were limiting factors. At one month of age, the propranolol dose was increased to 4 mg/kg/day and the parents were educated in the use of an automatic external defibrillator. At 3.5 months of age, genetic analysis revealed that the baby was homozygous for KCNQ1 364dupT (Cys122LeufsX163), which is an autosomal recessive mutation known to cause long QT syndrome and consistent with a diagnosis of JLNS. JLNS is known to be associated with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Interestingly, although a routine newborn hearing screen was normal, a formal audiology examination demonstrated profound bilateral sensorineural loss. Subsequently, arrangements were made for bilateral cochlear implants. The parents were counselled about the increased risk of syncope, cardiac arrest and sudden death, as well as the rarity of the diagnosis (1.6 to 6 per million individuals worldwide [3]). The lifelong use of beta-blockers was emphasized and the possibility of the use of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator in the future was discussed. Furthermore, the parents were made aware of risk factors for exacerbation of the illness – specifically, increased physical activity and medications that prolong QT. The parents were informed about their risk for future children with JLNS (one in four), and genetic counselling for the family was arranged. At 18 months of age, the beta-blocker was changed to nadolol 12 mg orally twice daily (2.3 mg/kg/day). Bilateral cochlear implants were functioning normally, and the child was regularly participating in activation therapy. Significant bradycardia in infancy should prompt consideration of congenital long QT syndromes. Sensorineural hearing loss is associated with JLNS. Treatment must be individualized, and the risk of life-threatening arrhythmias remains.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Étude de cas · Signal consensuel: Étude de cas
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,008

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0010,002
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0050,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,258
Écart entre enseignants0,251 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeÉtude de cas
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePaediatrics & Child Health→Même sujetCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias→Travaux en français237 207→