MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W128690045

Opening the Circle: Welcoming Brother Sun

2013· article· en· W128690045 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Sandra Styres, Dawn Zinga

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueEducation and Critical Thinking Development
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBrotherAction (physics)Marketing buzzSociologyCall to actionPedagogyMedia studiesAestheticsEpistemologyAdvertising
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

As our feet rest upon mother earth and our faces are turned toward brother sun it is with great joy that we give thanks for all our relations. Understandings of self-in-relationship include Land, waterways, our animal relations as well as each other. As we turn our faces to the east and welcome brother sun this work reflects a new pathway dawning on the ways we think about and do Education. In this special issue we are turning away from past conceptions of Education. These conceptions have primarily focused on pathologizing students and educators and have often applied deficit theorizing approaches to identifying and understanding the issues. In communications about this issue, one of our colleagues Dwayne Donald shared his position on moving forward in conceptualizing Education. His call to action challenges educators and researchers to engage in more imaginative thinking that will deepen critical and thoughtful engagement and assist in understanding more fully the complex and tangled realities within Education. Within this issue we seek to address this call to action by resisting tendencies to report the struggles that have been reported in many other articles but instead chose to focus on ways that looked more deeply into understanding the reasons why people may struggle to bring thought into educational contexts. There is a tendency to look for tools and treat education and thought as buzz words or the new vogue. We are not interested in Indigenizing the academy or other education contexts. We are interested in exploring the more important questions revolving around examining what thought is and its multiple and shared expressions. We entitled this issue, Indigenous Education: Pathways to (Re)membering because, for us, it is important to recall that thought is rooted in and informed by ancient teachings, very old pedagogies and understandings of self-in-relationship. Within the current realities faced by educator and students, individuals are challenged to understand and implement these ancient teachings within current contexts in meaningful and respectful ways. We are not interested in perpetuating pan-Indianism or didactic pedagogies that continue to centre dominant western approaches within education. Neither does this issue provide cookie cutter models or tool kits that can be applied to education. Rather the articles in this issue, offer highly contextualized explorations of the myriad of ways that centre and privilege thought within educational contexts. Some offer highly developed approaches to engaging the issues associated with such work while others offer practical examples of implementation with a full consideration of the challenges associated with such implementations and the potential rewards. Voice is also an important consideration within the articles and many of the authors struggle with issues around positionality and the inclusion of various voices within the research. While some of the articles do directly address the tensions challenges and resistances within education, these articles are framed around an epistemology that centres thought within culturally aligned pedagogies that open up opportunities to understand such challenges in new and more complex ways. We begin our journey on the pathway to (re)membering by exploring understandings of land and self-in-relationship that inform current education contexts and broader educational realities. The place from which we begin our journey unfolds with Debassige's consideration of Aboriginal models of literacy within Anishinaabe traditional teachings in order to facilitate the ways knowledge may be taken up within educational contexts on Manitoulin Island. The next place on our jouney funds us with Styres, Haig-Brown and Blimkie who examine the possibilities of a pedagogy of Land within urban educational contexts in Central South Ontario. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,114
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,381

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0130,003
Communication savante0,0060,007
Science ouverte0,0010,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,007
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1140,035

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,047
Tête enseignante GPT0,306
Écart entre enseignants0,259 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2013
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducationMême sujetEducation and Critical Thinking DevelopmentTravaux en français237 207