Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
D. A. PENNEBAKER Keith Beattie. Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 2011, 176 pp.The idea of permeates every chapter of a new book exploring career of documentary filmmaker D. A. Pennebaker, latest in Contemporary Film Directors series published by University of Illinois Press. What at first seems an odd framing device for a direct cinema pioneer becomes glaringly appropriate and enlightening as an effective mode of cat- egorization.Even as D. A. Penny Pennebaker's films employ an observational style, author Keith Beattie notes that those in front of camera are uniquely performing real-an implicit, often-unspoken interaction between filmmaker and subject, standing out as hallmark of Pennebaker's nearly sixty-year body of work.From concert films (clearly performed) to celebrity portraits (can famous people ever be real?) to experimental collaborations that blur line between documentary and fiction (where real people act as other real people), D. A. Pennebaker is a master at capturing those who provide him access to their inner selves, personas that are nonetheless often specifi- cally enacted for camera. But doesn't this notion of defy tenets of observational cinema? Does this make document less true? Not so, Beattie posits throughout D. A. Pennebaker. Rather, the pres- ence of camera is basis of a license or a warrant for a subject to extend an off-camera performance before camera. The underlying position in this assessment . . . is that per- formed self is real or authentic self (14).This thesis is demonstrated clearly in concert films such as Monterey Pop (1968), Ziggy Star- dust and Spiders from Mars (1973), Sweet Toronto (1971), Depeche Mode 101 (1989), Down from Mountain (2000), and Only Strong Survive (2003). The sheer number of these clas- sic music documentaries is enough to justify a retrospective examination, yet they encompass simply most easily defined arena where heavily plays out in front of Pennebaker team's multiple cameras.Beattie delights reader with a break- down of who shot what, where, and with what tricked-out 16mm camera. Pennebaker's rock- umentaries had direct cinema pioneer Albert Maysles wielding his signature handheld style in front of stage or roaming through crowd, with partner Ricky Leacock filming from rooftops, while Pennebaker stayed onstage to capture audience reactions and remain close to performers.And list of performers is astonishing: John Lennon, David Bowie, Chuck Berry, Jerry Lee Lewis, Ralph Stanley, Bo Diddley, Emmylou Harris, Wilson Pickett, Ravi Shankar, Who, Jefferson Airplane, and of course, holy trin- ity captured in Monterey Pop-Jimi Hendrix, Joplin, and Otis Redding-whose short ca- reers were launched by vanguard performances at festival. For Redding, who died before film was released, Monterey Pop stands as a rare document of an extraordinary talent, one not filmed extensively. And as Pennebaker candidly notes in an interview at end of book, television wasn't ready for Jimi Hendrix and Janis (135). Although film was originally made for ABC, network rejected Monterey Pop, declaring it meet indus- try standards. Leacock's reply-'I didn't know you had any' sealed fate (41), spurring entrepreneurial documentary team of Leacock and Pennebaker to undertake a successful in- dependent self-distribution strategy, at a time when few filmmakers knew how to do this.Beattie extensively examines Pennebaker's classic film Don't Look Back, made with a twenty-three-year-old Bob Dylan, providing cogent insight into filming itself. More importantly, he directly addresses canons of documentary by underscoring a clear-eyed understanding between filmmaker and subject: A compact-in form of a conspiracy, col- laboration, and collusion-between Dylan and Pennebaker was struck (98). …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle