Conversations about wellness and support in an aboriginal teacher education program
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Traditional Indigenous societies had intact ways of teaching, learning, and education.After contact with non-Indigenous peoples, educational orientations and practices which respect and reflect Aboriginal context, community, and culture were influenced and changed.In the present context, Métis and First Nations peoples in Canada have been in the process of reclaiming educational authority of their children and youth.One way that this educational authority has more recently been realized is through the establishment of Aboriginal Teacher Education Programs (ATEPs) where Aboriginal individuals are being prepared to be teachers for the teaching profession.Aboriginal TEPs are distinct entities within university teacher preparation programs.Aboriginal TEPs are unique in approach and functioning and reflect the ideological orientations and practices of the Aboriginal communities in which they are situated.This study explored the understandings of both Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal staff and faculty in relation to wellness and support within the Saskatchewan Urban Native Teacher Education Program (SUNTEP), in Prince Albert, Saskatchewan, Canada.This is a case study of one site.The findings provide a meaningful conception of the functions of wellness and support at the research site and were described from the participants primarily as relationships with self, family, and community.viii program that had nurtured and developed me through a personal and professional development experience.I felt very excited and anxious at the same time.I began the school year under the tender care of seasoned ITEP staff persons and with this new beginning my life journey changed once again.I now became responsible to give back to ITEP students what had been given to me as an ITEP student.As an ITEP staff member, I was given two main duties as employment tasks.I was expected to support Aboriginal students enrolled in our program and I was required to teach university classes.These duties embody the personal and professional development goals available for Aboriginal adult learners in ITEP as they prepared to become teachers.In order to accomplish these duties, during the first years of my employment I was mentored by ITEP staff members and other professional colleagues.In this environment, I had the opportunity to grow into my job.Over time, through my employment, the raising of my children, and engaging in graduate studies work, the two main employment duties required of me became more and more understandable.As I grew into my professional role, I soon learned that the very issues that I had faced as an undergraduate student, and I continued to face as I grew personally and professionally, with few exceptions were one and the same.I began to acknowledge the many expressions of individual spiritual, emotional, physical, and intellectual needs.After a number of years, I recognized how wellness and support are integral functions in ITEP which respond to these development needs, and from this experience I have become more and more curious about a deeper understanding of wellness and support in Aboriginal TEPs.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,031 | 0,010 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».