MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W131769107

Teacher Professional Development to Promote Constructivist Uses of the Internet: A Study of One Graduate-Level Course

2004· article· en· W131769107 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Susan E. Gibson, Bonnie Skaalid

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of Technology and Teacher Education · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Alberta
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésConstructivism (international relations)Constructivist teaching methodsThe InternetSocial constructivismMathematics educationPsychologyPedagogyClass (philosophy)Learning theoryTeaching methodEducational technologyComputer scienceWorld Wide Web
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This article describes a graduate course entitled Using the Internet to engage children in constructivist offered as professional development for teachers at a large Canadian university. Course participants, who were practicing teachers, were provided opportunities to examine how computer technologies such as the Internet can be used to promote a more student-centered, constructivist approach to teaching and learning. An informal study was undertaken to examine what participants learned about constructivism and its influence on their thinking about the use of the Internet in their teaching. Data collected included field notes from class observations, informal interviews with selected students, daily reflective journal entries, and class assignments. Changes in the participants' understanding about the potential of the Internet as a constructivist learning tool are presented as well as those aspects of the course that were identified by the participants as being most effective in bringing about the change in their thinking. These aspects included the intensive full-week focus with ample computer lab time to explore a wide variety of preselected sites, modeling of a constructivist learning environment by the instructor, and repeated attention to making theory to practice connections. ********** Recent research on effective integration of computer technologies in schools points to uses that support constructivist learning principles (Jonassen, Howland, Moore, & Marra, 2003). Constructivism is being defined here as a learning theory that is guided by a number of principles, including: (a) learning is an active and social process in which the learner constructs new knowledge rather than acquiring information and instruction is viewed as a process of supporting that construction rather than communicating knowledge (Brooks & Brooks, 1993); (b) new learning builds on previously stored knowledge and as the learner elaborates upon and interprets the information, initial ideas are reshaped (Fosnot, 1992); and, (c) learning occurs most effectively when it is situated in experiences that are authentic and meaningful to the learner (Duffy & Cunningham, 1996). A critical factor in this successful integration of computers into teaching and learning is teacher training (Crocco, 2001). Professional development experiences that move teachers toward an understanding of constructivist learning principles and how to enact them through the use of technology are fundamental (Gibson & Oberg, 1998). This article describes one such professional development opportunity, a university-level graduate course, designed to involve participants in both an investigation of constructivist learning principles and in active engagement in activities that model the potential of the Internet for supporting those principles. LITERATURE REVIEW Although computers are now widely available in schools, their educational impact has been limited (Kleiman, 2000). Only a small proportion of teachers actively integrates computer technologies in their teaching (Albion & Gibson, 1998). The main barriers to adequate computer integration have been attributed to limited access to computer hardware and software, lack of support, lack of time for preparation, and perceived inadequacies in training (Downs & Rakestraw, 1997). However, recent studies have discovered that even though teachers have adequate access to and technological support for their use of computers, they are still not using computers as frequently or effectively as they could be (Cuban, Kirkpatrick, & Peck, 2001; Levin & Arafeh, 2002). One possible reason can be attributed to the type of professional development they have been experiencing (Gibson & Oberg, 1998). Much of the emphasis of teacher professional development with technology to date has been on learning about computer-based tools and acquiring the skills needed to work with those tools. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,008
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,015
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,041

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0080,017
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0150,006
Communication savante0,0080,003
Science ouverte0,0020,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,008
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,086
Tête enseignante GPT0,405
Écart entre enseignants0,320 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations11
Publié2004
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journal of Technology and Teacher EducationMême sujetInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsTravaux en français237 207