Re-imagining citizenry : national identities in Canadian and Australian multicultural drama
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This dissertation explores the dramaturgical and theatrical methods employed by playwrights of multicultural plays in Canada and Australia. These plays work to complicate ideas of the nation as uncomplicated examples of postcolonial, cosmopolitan, and multicultural nations. While the plays suggest that there exists an imagined version of the nation that upholds a white, English-speaking hegemony, the characters present counter-discursive readings of the nation. I assert that while multiculturalism remains a prominent ideology in the definitions of Canadian and Australian national identities, the reality of lived experiences in these multicultural nations do not always align with the idealised social narratives of the imaginary citizenry. Building on the body of research about multicultural theatre in Canada and Australia by scholars such as Helen Gilbert, Ric Knowles, Jacqueline Lo, Marc Maufort, Anne Nothof, Joanne Tompkins, and Jerry Wasserman, I examine the strategies playwrights are using to contend with over-simplified determinations of cultural and national identities. This dissertation moves into terrain that has been less explored through its determination of what I call the “imaginary citizen” templates: using Ghassan Hage’s White Nation as the guide for my categorisations has enabled a reading of multicultural drama which locates implicit, oversimplified expectations of identity as they exist in the imaginary nations on stage. These plays undermine such prescriptive identities, as their characters seek out alternative, individually constructed identities. For this reason, I contend that many multicultural plays from Canada and Australia can be understood to contribute productively to the project of upsetting western, hegemonic norms and expanding the range of signifiers through which audience members construct meaning for the nation and its citizenry. Through a consideration of Ric Knowles’s notion of the “dramaturgy of the perverse,” I read these plays as “foreground[ing] and denaturaliz[ing] their inherited structural principles, together with their ideological weights” to rupture western expectations of naturalism; these plays offer a “genuinely productive cultural intervention” (Knowles 52). This perversity, I argue, is achieved centrally by two means: self-narration and split subjectivity. Applying the lens of Paul Ricoeur’s theory of “narrative identity” provides the plays’ characters with the agency to determine individuated versions of themselves, and, thereby deny the simplified identities of the imaginary citizenry. This process of self-narration becomes an embodied, visceral experience for the audience as the characters’ subjectivities are shifted and altered when they shift into younger selves, family members, friends, or even strangers. The doubling or splitting of roles provides the characters with insights that allow them to productively determine their own identities, as opposed to being assigned an externally created identity to maintain a strategic balance within the nation, in place to keep a white, English-speaking hegemony in control of an “ideal homely nation” (Hage 71). Other theatrical strategies, such as undermining linguistic hegemony, varying cultural signifiers, and self-consciously employing metatheatre and satire, also enable these plays to do important cultural work to refuse the imaginary versions of these multicultural nations as they exist on Canadian and Australian stages. This dissertation asserts that the theatre is a space and place where identities can be challenged, disrupted, interrogated, and destablised in officially multicultural Canada and Australia. Theatre is, therefore, a place where a “deeper commitment to a more far-reaching multiculturalism” can be achieved (Hage 26).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,039 | 0,022 |
| Communication savante | 0,012 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,009 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».