MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W134292487

"Patron-Client Relationships in the Radical Enlightenment"

2008· article· en· W134292487 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Edward Andrew

Notice bibliographique

RevueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEnlightenmentScottish EnlightenmentPhilosophyPoliticsSubject (documents)ClassicsArt historyArtLawTheologyPolitical science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

My paper examines Lord Shelburne's relationships to his intellectual protégés, particularly Jeremy Bentham.I propose to analyze the reasons Shelburne drew thinkers (who have often been described as the radical Enlightenment) around himself, and what drew thinkers to him.Although patronage had been declared outdated in the middle of the eighteenth century by Samuel Johnson and Jean D'Alembert, and David Hume and Adam Smith misleadingly proclaimed that an independent existence was possible in the intellectual marketplace of a democratic print culture, most of the important writers (including Johnson, D'Alembert, Hume and Smith) of the eighteenth century received royal or aristocratic patronage.Indeed, patronage seems incompatible with the central motif of Enlightenment -independent thought or intellectual autonomy.However, if England could be said to have had an Enlightenment comparable to that in Scotland, France of America, it was largely composed of protégés of Lord Shelburne.The subject of my paper is Lord Shelburne's relationship to those he patronized, namely, Bentham, Price.Priestley, Smith, Franklin, Blackstone, William Jones the Orientalist, and Maurice Morgan, the emancipator of slaves.Also, through his patronage of André Morellet, Shelburne was connected to Helvétius, D'Holbach, Turgot and other philosophes, as well as their patronnes, such as Mme du Deffand, Mme de Boufflers and Mme Geoffrin.Shelburne arranged for Condorcet to be translated into English and Bentham into French.Because of his French connections, as well as his conciliatory position with respect to the Americans, George III chose him as first minister in 1782 in the attempt to come to terms with both the Americans and the French.Although Shelburne's poor reputation predated his term as first minister, began with the youthful and ambitious participation in the cabinet of "the great commoner", William Pitt who became the Earl of Chatham's in1766, his attempt to secure peace, despite the conflicting demands of the Americans and French, amplified the sobriquets of "the Jesuit of Berkeley Square" and especially Malagrida, the unfortunate Italian Jesuit unjustly executed for treason in an attempt on the life of the Portuguese king Joseph in 1758.In a maladroit attempt to be affable, Oliver Goldsmith exclaimed to Shelburne:"what can make People call your Lordship Malagrida?For by what ever I have heard Malagrida was a very good sort of Man." 1 The greatest patrons of the eighteenth century attempted by means of patronage to repair poor reputations.Catherine the Great, after murdering her husband and then the heir Ivan to the Russian throne supported Voltaire and Diderot (both of whom suppressed the French ambassador's account of Catherine's assumption of power), as well as D'Alembert, Grimm, Galiani, Condorcet and the Bentham brothers.Mme de Pompadour, Mme de Tencin and Mme duDeffand, three of the most important sponsors of les lumi res, had racy and rather unsavoury pasts that were covered over by their sponsorship of arts and letters, and their protection of philosophes.An additional reason for patronizing philosophers was provided by Jean D'Alembert who accounted for "the patronage of the great" by his contention that they "are quite happy to be learned on condition that they can become so without trouble, and so wish to be able to judge a work of intelligence without hard study, in exchange for the benefits they promise to the author or for the friendship with which they think they honor him." 2 D'Alembert's account did not account for two of the three greatest patrons of the British Enlightenment; Baron Somers (who patronized Locke, Toland, Defoe and Tindal early in the century) and the 3 rd Duke of Argyll who patronized virtually everyone in the Scottish Enlightenment-even David Hume who

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,011
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,032
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,212

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0110,014
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0320,047
Communication savante0,0180,009
Science ouverte0,0020,012
Intégrité de la recherche0,0070,011
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0170,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,249
Écart entre enseignants0,216 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueeScholarship (California Digital Library)→Même sujetAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics→Travaux en français237 207→