MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W136008660

Taking Account of History: How Much and How Little Have Changed in a Century

2004· article· en· W136008660 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anita Dennis

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of accountancy online/Journal of accountancy · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueAccounting and Organizational Management
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCentennialAuditGovernment (linguistics)AccountingPolitical scienceHistoryBusiness
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In 1904 an international Congress of Accountants took place in St. Louis. This first drew representatives not only from across the United States but also from England, Scotland, Holland and Canada. This congress a major event in the formative years of the U.S. accounting profession, according to the Journal of Accountancy's AICPA Centennial issue, published in 1987. The rise of large corporations in the decades before the congress--and some spectacular panics and stock market crashes--underscored the importance of proper accounting procedures and financial reporting. This gathering of accountants at the dawn of the new century was intended as an event at which the attendees could consider what kinds of services and procedures businesses required and what the profession must do to meet those needs. It took place against the backdrop of the St. Louis World's Fair, which attracted nearly 20 million visitors to 1,500 exhibit buildings where they could sample groundbreaking inventions that ranged from the wireless telegraph to the ice cream cone. look back at that first meeting shows not only some of the origins of the profession but also the importance of the issues being discussed. In a profession that was still inventing itself in many ways, the attendees were debating topics such as auditing, accounting for profits and government issues, all of them timeless themes. In addition, the proceedings show the quality of ideas being generated by those revolved. At a time long before codified generally accepted accounting principles or auditing standards, participants were developing and discussing some of the standards and procedures that would form the basis of professional practice. A century is a good time to take stock, notes Gary Previts, CPA, professor of accountancy and associate dean of undergraduate programs at the Weatherhead School of Management at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland. Previts says many of those who attended the first world congress would become important figures in the profession. What stands out is how many names are familiar and still recognized today as potential or actual Accounting Hall of Fame members, says Dale Flesher, CPA, a professor at the University of Mississippi's school of accountancy. In addition, in reviewing the proceedings of this first gathering, I am impressed that it is a very important portfolio about the ideas of practice. The ideas reflect fundamental issues that face us Flesher says. This article highlights that pivotal event. KEY THEMES Consolidating the profession. An important but unspoken agenda of the congress was to try to find a way to organize the profession nationally. Great Britain had a more highly developed accounting profession at the time and many British accountants--such as Arthur Lowes Dickinson--who had come to the United States to practice became very influential, but the American accountants wanted to build their own profession. Federal recognition of the profession of the public accountant can be secured only by a strong representative national body speaking with one voice from Maine to California, the congress's chairman, Joseph Sterrett, said in his opening remarks. Many of the people behind the congress hoped to lay the groundwork for a single recognized national organization, but some in attendance had reservations about the idea. There were the same kinds of tensions we see today, between large and small firms and between global and regional organizations, Previts says. People learn how to manage these issues, but they don't necessarily solve them. One year after the congress, the movement toward a single national organization was strengthened by a merger of two early national bodies, the Federation of Societies of Public Accountants and the American Association of Public Accountants, based on discussions that had begun at the congress. burgeoning market economy. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,219
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,007
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,226
Écart entre enseignants0,204 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of accountancy online/Journal of accountancyMême sujetAccounting and Organizational ManagementTravaux en français237 207