African American Women and the Niagara Movement, 1905-1909
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In 1905, between July 11 and July 15, twenty nine African American men met in Buffalo, New York to launch a new movement, Niagara Movement. Spearheaded by W. E. B. DuBois, Niagara Movement lasted just four years and became precursor to National Association for Advancement of Colored People, also led by DuBois, in 1909. While no African American women were part of original group of twenty nine that formed Niagara Movement yet, in many ways Black women became an integral part of movement. This article will present their story. Black women were gender capital of Niagara Movement, though perhaps that was not intention of 29 men who came together to form this group. This article is divided into four sections in order to create story of women in Niagara Movement: Mary Burnett Talbert, Carrie W. Clifford, Gertrude Morgan and Membership Lists. MARY BURNETT TALBERT The first meeting of Niagara Movement opened on July 11, 1905 at house of Mary Burnett and W.M Talbert. A graduate of Oberlin College, Mary Talbert became one of the most widely known activist[s] in by turn of century. (2) (photo #1) Talbert was an active participant in many different organizations in Buffalo including those created within and outside of church. In her lifetime, she held such high positions as President of Buffalo Phyllis Wheatly Club in 1899, President of National Association of Colored Women in 1916, and led National Association for Advancement of Colored People's anti-lynching crusade in 1922 as National Director of Anti-Lynching Committee and became first woman to speak before Norwegian House of Parliament in 1920. As a result of her many years of hard work in support of improvement of lives of African Americans, and her work with Anti-Lynching campaign, Talbert became first woman to receive highest award given by NAACP, Spingarn Medal in 1922. (3) Mary Talbert was also an acquaintance of Booker T. Washington, as well as Washington sought Talbert's assistance in keeping him informed of actions of participants in Niagara Movement. In a letter dated July 8, 1905, Washington wrote to his wife Margaret asking her to, write to Mrs. Talbert to keep you closely informed about proceedings and names of people connected with Buffalo meeting next (4) Expressing her usefulness as an informant in another letter dated same day, Washington wrote, Tell Crosby look after Buffalo meeting sharply. It is to be held next week. Inside data can be gotten from Talbert (5) Washington seemed to have been aware that meeting was to be held at Talbert's residence from a latter correspondence by Clifford H. Plummer to Washington. In letter he states, My dear Mr. Washington: I arrived home this morning and called you up first thing ... report was not true; in fact there really was no conference in Buffalo where delegates were in attendance ... I was located near 521 Michigan Avenue from Wednesday morning until Friday and I can state positively that none of men named in report were present except DuBois. (6) It is not certain as to which report this was, however, 521 Michigan Avenue was Talbert's address. The meeting began at their residence on July 11th and next day moved to Erie Hotel on Canadian side of Falls. (photo #2) Washington's spy arrived at residence a day late. The fact that Niagara Movement meeting began at Talbert's residence on July 11, 1905 is corroborated by other contemporary sources. A letter dated June 13, 1905 written by DuBois to Mr. W.M. Talbert, Mary Talbert's husband informs him of proposed meeting. DuBois writes to him about finding accommodation for gentleman who would be coming to Buffalo for meeting. The letter has address, 521, Michigan Avenue at top. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,013 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».