MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W137233062

Current developments in organic farming.

2007· article· en· W137233062 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maria Eugênia Ortiz Escobar, N. V. Hue, S. G. Pandalai

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOrganic farmingCurrent (fluid)AgricultureEnvironmental scienceBusinessEngineeringEcologyBiologyElectrical engineering
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Organic farming uses almost exclusively biological and natural materials and processes to produce food. The practice aims to protect human health and conserve, maintain or enhance natural resources, with the goal to preserve the quality of the environment for future generations while being economically sustainable. Organic farming has grown rapidly throughout the world in recent years. Currently, Australia (Oceania) has the largest land areas under farming, Liechtenstein (Europe) the highest percentage of area, and Mexico (Latin America) the greatest number of farms worldwide. One of the most valuable benefits of Correspondence/Reprint request: Dr. N.V. Hue, Department of Tropical Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Hawaii, USA. E-mail: nvhue@hawaii.edu M.E. Ortiz Escobar & N.V. Hue 2 farming is the improvement in soil quality, which can be expressed in terms of chemical, physical and biological properties and their interactions. In this article, we will discuss the properties, regulations and impacts of farming on human livelihood and the environment. Overview of farming Organic farming has expanded rapidly in recent years and is seen as a sustainable alternative to chemical-based agricultural systems (Stockdale et al., 2001; Biao et al., 2003; Avery, 2007). Its annual growth rate has been about 20% for the last decade (Lotter, 2003), accounting for over 31 million hectares (ha) and generating over 26 billion US dollars in annual trade worldwide (Yussefi, 2006). Nutrient management in farming systems is often based on soil fertility building via nitrogen (N) fixation and nutrient recycling of materials, such as farmyard manure and crop residues, with limited inputs from permitted fertilizers (Gosling and Shepherd, 2005). Although farming has been criticized for relying on the build-up of soil phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) by past fertilization before converting to (Nguyen et al., 1995; Greenland, 2000; Loes and Ogaard, 2001), its acceptance and popularity are growing due mostly to environmental and healthrelated concerns (Biao et al., 2003; Galantini and Rosell, 2006). A recent polling of residents of Ontario, Canada reveals that more than half think food is more nutritious; two-thirds believe food is safer than conventionally grown food; and 9 out of 10 believe fruits and vegetables are grown without pesticides of any kind (Avery, 2007). The aims and principles of farming, as presented in the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM) Basic Standards for production and processing are listed in Table 1. A shift to agriculture brings about significant changes: restricted use of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, increases of other inputs such as materials, labor, perhaps machinery, cultural practices (e.g., crop rotation), and better knowledge of biological processes. These changes have serious implications. Thus, farmers should consider the following issues before practicing organics (FAO, 1998): * Labor inputs: Labor is important to the production process, and can be an impediment to the adoption of agriculture. Compared to large-scale mechanized agricultural systems, farming appears more laborintensive. Many techniques used in farming require significant labor (e.g., strip farming, non-chemical weeding, composting). In the developed Current developments in farming 3 Table 1. The principal aims of production and processing (IFOAM, 1998). world, labor scarcity and costs may deter farmers from adopting systems. This may also be true for cash-poor farmers and those supplementing their incomes with off-farm work. However, where labor is not a constraint, agriculture can provide employment opportunities, especially in rural communities. Furthermore, the diversification of crops typically found on farms, with their various planting and harvesting schedules, may result in more work opportunities for women and a more evenly distributed labor demand which helps stabilize employment. * Other production-related inputs: The absence of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides in farming necessitates other inputs from manure addition to crop selection or irrigation. Farmers' knowledge of local conditions and of traditional practices is essential to the success of farming. The emphasis of crop varieties and animal breeds used in agriculture is on local suitability with respect to disease resistance and adaptability to local climate. M.E. Ortiz Escobar & N.V. Hue 4 * Crop rotation: This operation is required under certification programs and is considered essential in management. Agricultural pests are often specific to the host (i.e., a particular crop), and will multiply as long as the crop is there. Alternating crops in time (rotations) or space (stripcropping and intercropping) is therefore an important tool for controlling pests, and also for maintaining soil fertility. As the use of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides allows the farmer to grow the crop that is financially most rewarding, not using those inputs may limit the choice of crops. The success of an farm depends on the identification of end-uses and/or markets for all the crops in the rotation, as few farmers can afford to leave fields fallow. This remains one of the most significant challenges in agriculture. * Yield: Yields on farms, although may not be as high as those produced by conventional practices, fall within an acceptable range (Avery, 2007). Encouragingly, organically produced yields currently are significantly higher than those produced before the 1950s. Part of this progress can be attributed to new varieties and better knowledge of biological processes used in farming. For example, if N mineralization is slow because of cool/wet growing-conditions, crops on farms may not have sufficient N early in the season. However, better knowledge on N synchronization between N release by manures and N demand by crops could minimize or even eliminate this N deficiency problem (Hue and Silva, 2000; Myers et al., 1997). Definition of farming There are many definitions of farming, which is also known as agriculture (Gosling et al., 2006) or biodynamic agriculture (Lampkin, 2002). Some have considered farming and sustainable agriculture synonymous, because they are both based on sustainability of agroecological systems. Sustainability can be defined as meeting the need of the present without compromising the ability of future generations (WCED, 1987). The word organic is legally protected in some countries, avoiding their indiscriminate use in non-organic products. In the European Union (EU), for example, this word has been protected since the early 1990s in Englishspeaking countries. The equivalent in French, Italian, Portuguese and Dutchspeaking countries is biological, and ecological in Danish, German and Spanish-speaking countries (FAO, 1998). Organic farming according to Henning et al. (1991) is both a philosophy and a system of farming, grounded in values that reflect an awareness of and social realities and the ability of the individual to take effective actions. In practice, it is designed to work with natural processes to conserve resources, encourage self-regulation through diversity, to minimize waste and environmental impacts, while preserving farm profitability. Current developments in farming 5 According to Lampkin (1994, 1997), the aim of farming is: “to create integrated, humane, environmentally and economically sustainable production systems, which maximize reliance on farm-derived renewable resources and the management of and biological processes and interactions, so as to provide acceptable levels of crop, livestock and human nutrition, protection from pests and disease, and an appropriate return to the human and other resources”. As such, farming shares the fundamental objectives of agricultural sustainability and is deserved to be assessed as a mainstream part of sustainable agriculture (Edward-Jones and Howells, 2001). IFOAM (2000) has defined agriculture as “a process that develops a viable and sustainable agro ecosystem”. In practical terms, farming is a form of agriculture that shies away from synthetic inputs such as pesticides and fertilizers (because of their negative effects on the balance) but uses agricultural practices such as crop rotation, proper spacing between plants, incorporation of matter into the soil, and composting (Kuo et al., 2004). With restrictions on the use of chemical fertilizers, the principal challenge to converting a conventional farm to an one is to provide N, K (because these two elements are required at rather large quantities by most crops and because they are easily leached from soils), and to a lesser extent, other plant nutrients at rates and times to ensure acceptable crop yields (Rodrigues et al., 2006; Hue and Silva, 2000). Production requirements in farming While conventional farming needs abundant, man-made resources, farming makes use of functional integrity of the system (Boelling et al., 2003). Organic farming depends on the local environment (soil, water) and less powerful tools (heavy equipment). Although the exact production methods vary, general principles include the exclusion of most synthetic biocides and fertilizers, the management of soils through addition of materials and use of crop rotation (IFOAM, 1998). The requirements (which apply to the way the product is created, not to the measurable properties of the product itself) by the USDA National Organic Program (NOP) are summarized as follows (NOP, 2006).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,061
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,205

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0610,022

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,238
Écart entre enseignants0,221 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations16
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics→Travaux en français237 207→